IETF Logo Mail Archive

[sipcore] Session Timers (RFC 4028) for REFER, PUBLISH, MESSAGE not defined

Samir Srivastava <srivastava_samir@hush.com> Sun, 10 May 2020 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <srivastava_samir@hush.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C0C3A096E for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2020 06:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hush.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WaD7o9fdXEQL for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2020 06:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51CC33A096C for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 2020 06:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EBE82E0112 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:12:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-hush-tls-connected: 1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hush.com; h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; bh=HX6zy6yPJU3dL/92c1055ljjLz7wynkXpu47rr9pWoo=; b=iaV0Hrvn3ko8CbKFmoFiG0YptQ4nZB2S0Z/p/eXjfYUUFCMa7oBao4uDUXzghAM/CVfJiAosD0vZKzQE47MPPN4Mb08n03j7ZTo3MtwO9Glbr1pnEasdcSm24LlDSQNrIEG1fXSvCRW2k8IKVujIpNx9ElG7Qny2xxvSD6nXeGeL71A33Ic/CrFoes+WktucgOmoXJlqWs2B3zRqzJLL4/FSUP2BLQBTIQ1Og5kls4FyjdJMT1CUgZ72W6a3FldaqRzjUTn0QAbzNpUC4l5tbNlqLddr3bL+s3Pmpp9B+hby96kAEXfn608QWYr2s7jbpVmBlXjfqmBkxDaiIpwrdQ==
Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:12:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 8E2A6C0171; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:12:35 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 19:12:35 +0600
To: sipcore@ietf.org
From: Samir Srivastava <srivastava_samir@hush.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_a22f43deb24f90205e232109ea8b70df"
Message-Id: <20200510131235.8E2A6C0171@smtp.hushmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/1cn8g6Ap1OrLB2v7L444ndLoNZQ>
Subject: [sipcore] Session Timers (RFC 4028) for REFER, PUBLISH, MESSAGE not defined
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 13:12:42 -0000

Hi,
  The table mentioned in Section 4 in RFC 4028 does not contain
entries for REFER, PUBLISH and MESSAGE methods Below is the table from
Section 4
	  
+---------------+-----+-----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ 
  |     Header   
|where|proxy|ACK|BYE|CAN|INV|OPT|REG|PRA|UPD|SUB|NOT|   
+---------------+-----+-----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ 
  |Session-Expires|  R  | amr | - | - | - | o | - | - | - | o | - | -
|    |               |     |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
  |    |Session-Expires| 2xx | ar  | - | - | - | o | - | - | - | o | -
| - |    |               |     |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
  |   |    |Min-SE         |  R  | amr | - | - | - | o | - | - | - | o
| - | - |    |               |     |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
  |   |   |    |Min-SE         | 422 |     | - | - | - | m | - | - | -
| m | - | - |   
+---------------+-----+-----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ 
They are not applicable for these, but it would have been better if it
is said categorically.
ThanksSamir Srivastava
https://samirsrivastava.typepad.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email