Re: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-01

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Thu, 31 March 2011 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: siprec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3153A6AC4 for <siprec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.710, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_210=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_27=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_29=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TA0pZHFp6BCV for <siprec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B583A6767 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=pkyzivat@cisco.com; l=2656; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1301573964; x=1302783564; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jTKYQOt993wOPvfFN5MXqIkzTSJFKEzffQjujZzfFr4=; b=W1VCZq5hAcPYn0ocqxaP3auXcuEf47m+U5YHuXi4B3JNZwkK7EiAwqdO N7iHxF6JgCAUQlHsjDt1y7x02/25KNoYCyyuNRNm3ZKPiloCFtYUzyUWE Ouxw1Ti+S71uOYgOwZcaowefb+FK/mkc3IOHX0yxjnynzsfyFkksrhp04 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtsDAB5wlE2Q/khNgWdsb2JhbACERqEHFAEBFiYliHmZXIs+kFKBKINMdwSNEYNV
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,275,1299456000"; d="scan'208";a="23945269"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Mar 2011 12:19:23 +0000
Received: from [10.61.86.68] (ams3-vpn-dhcp5701.cisco.com [10.61.86.68]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2VCJNIr016773; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:19:23 GMT
Message-ID: <4D94714B.8010102@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:19:23 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <4D93ADCB.2050106@stpeter.im> <4D94416E.7070102@cisco.com> <4D944429.10607@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4D944429.10607@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-01
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/siprec>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:17:45 -0000

On 3/31/2011 5:06 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I am booked through 11 PM tonight.
>
> Tomorrow I have the following windows of time:
>
> 07:00-07:30
> 15:15-16:00
>
> Naturally that time might get filled if issues come up in some of my
> working groups. :)

But you also have 11-12pm tonite? :-)
(That is much better for me than the others.)

Maybe its just too late in the week to hope for this.
We can take it to the list.

	Thanks,
	Paul

> On 3/31/11 10:55 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>> Peter/Joe,
>>
>> Do either of you have any time in the remainder of the week when some of
>> us could sit and try to sort out the right way to do the extension data?
>> I doubt it would take very long.
>>
>>      Thanks,
>>      Paul
>>
>> On 3/30/2011 6:25 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> Here is some quick feedback on draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-01. I
>>> hope to review it more fully soon.
>>>
>>> 1. I would change application/recording to application/recording+xml in
>>> accordance with RFC 3023 (many specs illustrate the use of XML media
>>> types -- see for example RFC 4287).
>>>
>>> 2. The large number of<extensiondata/>   elements is a bit confusing in
>>> the examples.
>>>
>>> 3. In Section 5.1, the example has one<extensiondata/>   element
>>> qualified by the 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:siprec' namespace (no other
>>> namespace is defined) and then multiple<extensiondata/>   elements
>>> qualified by other namespaces ('http://example.com/groupapp',
>>> 'http://example.com/sessionapp', etc.). Although those other namespaces
>>> are certainly *allowed* to use "extensiondata" as an element name
>>> (that's the beauty of namespaces), it is confusing in this document.
>>> Perhaps you even meant to have<extensiondata/>   elements qualified by
>>> the 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:siprec' and then child elements qualified by
>>> other namespaces (in accordance with the schema). However, that is not
>>> clear in the spec.
>>>
>>> 4. There is no built-in datatype for xs:urnuuid, xs:streamMode,
>>> xs:requester, and so on. See W3C XML Schema Part 2:
>>>
>>>      http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#built-in-datatypes
>>>
>>> 5. The data in the<name/>   elements with xml:lang="it" really should be
>>> Giulietta Capuleti and Romeo Montecchi. ;-)
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> siprec mailing list
>>> siprec@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec
>> _______________________________________________
>> siprec mailing list
>> siprec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec
>
>