Re: [Softwires] WG last call on draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-01

Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> Fri, 01 June 2012 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F2B21F8550 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 00:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.572, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ir1nDo6tltVo for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 00:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp23.services.sfr.fr (smtp23.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0589621F854C for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 00:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2306.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 608947000042; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:59:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (per92-10-88-166-221-144.fbx.proxad.net [88.166.221.144]) by msfrf2306.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 92BD57000098; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:59:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-SFR-UUID: 20120601075929601.92BD57000098@msfrf2306.sfr.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <F259C6DD-ABDE-4D64-9693-B7BCBDFF8550@employees.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 09:59:29 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <674099CF-AD1A-4C56-89A2-FBDC6406F3E0@laposte.net>
References: <CBE85B24.20626%cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn> <F259C6DD-ABDE-4D64-9693-B7BCBDFF8550@employees.org>
To: Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] WG last call on draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-01
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 07:59:31 -0000

2012-05-30 15:55, Ole Trøan:

> public 4over6 is exactly the same as MAP in hub and spoke mode with one mapping rule per subscriber.

Could you clarify how this relates to the MAP-rule definition saying "Each MAP node in the domain has the same set of rules".
(draft-mdt-softwire-mapping-address-and-port-03)

RD




> and if Reinaldo is correct, also the same as b4-translated-ds-lite.
> 
> we have 4 mechanisms doing almost the exact same thing (4rd, MAP, 4over6, B4-translated).
> 
> I would suggest that we do not progress this document now, but pass it through the same review process that 4rd/MAP is going through. unless we can reach consensus on pruning prior to that.
> 
> cheers,
> Ole
> 
>> This is a wg last call on draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-01.
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6/
>> 
>> As usual, please send editorial comments to the authors and
>> substantive comments to the mailing list.
>> 
>> This wg last call will end on 2012 June 10 at 12pm EDT.
>> 
>> 
>> Yong & Alain
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Softwires mailing list
>> Softwires@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires