Re: [Softwires] WG last call on draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-01

Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> Fri, 08 June 2012 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D6411E8074 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.496, BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GwuMVvQS8-G for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp21.services.sfr.fr (smtp21.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B964D21F8812 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2117.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4122C70000A4; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:52:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (per92-10-88-166-221-144.fbx.proxad.net [88.166.221.144]) by msfrf2117.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4CC5D7000098; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:52:51 +0200 (CEST)
X-SFR-UUID: 20120608165251314.4CC5D7000098@msfrf2117.sfr.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <84C925A2-8737-46C4-B5D7-54C2FB1EFB6E@employees.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:52:50 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7693BA57-599D-40AB-9B5E-F80094DA7C23@laposte.net>
References: <CBF23F0B.21901%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com> <39098095-7D8B-44AA-9492-213283E89A4B@employees.org> <CAH3bfAD1RoE7pqAj-9wLv2L6JJcgWtSH76d3S8vQOB=7HYzJBA@mail.gmail.com> <1D677EF2-C5D8-4007-8F46-756C2A3939C4@employees.org> <CAC16W0A2bF=YhYH5bRY9u2My-E1yH8au2NFrELNRmN+StmtQrQ@mail.gmail.com> <9AA089CB-4927-4D9C-8ADB-5F4CBCF33AB4@laposte.net> <84C925A2-8737-46C4-B5D7-54C2FB1EFB6E@employees.org>
To: Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] WG last call on draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-01
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:53:16 -0000

Le 2012-06-08 à 18:31, Ole Trøan a écrit :

> Remi,
> 
>> Incidentally, while the WG draft on 4rd has been available since May 16, the MAP specification, which was claimed in Paris to be well stabilized, already tested, and urgent to be published, is still not available as a WG draft. I therefore believe that discussing relationship between MAP and/or 4rd and 4over6 would be more useful when an up-to-date MAP specification is available.
> 
> since you specifically bring it up.
> the MAP draft was posted on June 1, and we are awaiting the softwire chairs to approve it as a -00 softwire document.
> 
> I expect they are busy as everyone else, but Alain promised to get to it today.

Thanks.
RD

> 
> cheers,
> Ole
>