IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] Unified Softwire CPE: draft-bfmk-softwire-unified-cpe

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Fri, 30 November 2012 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40F621F8826 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 05:38:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xGHKhgoDXhwe for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 05:38:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232A421F8823 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 05:38:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (85-169-39-219.rev.numericable.fr [85.169.39.219]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2418B46984; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:38:27 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <50B8B6D2.8030905@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:38:26 +0100
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ian.farrer@telekom.de
References: <CCDE6FAC.47AAF%ian.farrer@telekom.de>
In-Reply-To: <CCDE6FAC.47AAF%ian.farrer@telekom.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Unified Softwire CPE: draft-bfmk-softwire-unified-cpe
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:38:28 -0000

Le 2012-11-30 14:22, ian.farrer@telekom.de a écrit :
> Ian: I broadly agree with what you've said, but one use case that did
> cross my mind is if you only needed to provision mesh routes to a client
> with no need for a concentrator/default route. A closed machine-to-machine
> type service could be an example of this architecture.

Ah good point. I always forget about that use case.

> I'm not sure if it's a strong enough use case to build the provisioning
> model around, however.

Not sure either.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email