IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 14 August 2019 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A67212082B for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UaaUvz8W4fIc for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FBD112026E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x7EFvg8r008255; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:03:23 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=4D+xhyHyNUGOIKp53EgmEi//52zTBx12RBjbKtGv6lE=; b=G2bTiZeNGgQILzpwmAB/8rOZ80/NNZJZ5E+TDzNjqi1uvRcc60Wa9LLHGT8mYu9Sav2y uy+FNVIbg4TJifCnYZuMff7RiOaOEhHab5o8BrBM/8XWsCjnrjxnCJAK7YmRoQJ+6yyu IXuAHPa1J7iqjW4RIRrO9+WVBBAy8ziKa6J9jics5XmAQf5dlZhe0pK4oqtA+F20K2b0 Ub/tDghCh+NOp28Znip+TPgpX4DA7H25UrYwn8yyyS+flOB+1abvZkVzdXOdDp5sKLBJ SW+vKM7VTg8AYkV3B+DASDOlJtxrut47sYjEw1OohTyvNp45QbzqKIoZRSyAD8TM+E8I 5Q==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [96.6.114.87] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2ubf8n9myg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:03:23 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7EG35nf014217; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:03:22 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.53]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2u9s91stkk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:03:22 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:03:15 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:03:15 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
CC: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications
Thread-Index: AQHVRHASgHWOyDxjrUu01gmCUVZJrKbe47iAgAAEtQCAHEQsAP//vhUA
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:03:15 +0000
Message-ID: <762673AF-FADB-458B-B79A-E3E483BD3DDD@akamai.com>
References: <3DB1B550-26FA-4F93-8CFA-434C1F8811D1@vigilsec.com> <46773340-6bba-6c54-7049-c6ec30488174@cs.tcd.ie> <CAErg=HHJinZzoUuAJ76Js6YPFegr0jtwjpr2KTvU+1-JQASQPw@mail.gmail.com> <BL0PR14MB35231CD8E8C97E63F8949ED583AD0@BL0PR14MB3523.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR14MB35231CD8E8C97E63F8949ED583AD0@BL0PR14MB3523.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.37.20]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_762673AFFADB458BB79AE3E483BD3DDDakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-14_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=940 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908140155
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:5.22.84,1.0.8 definitions=2019-08-14_06:2019-08-14,2019-08-14 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=921 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1906280000 definitions=main-1908140155
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/9jJwj0H5mY9f0L3SEWEvy66rYQ4>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:03:33 -0000

>I’m not in favor of having to bother the AD for a re-charter for every minor clarification.  It is not a productive use of anyone’s time.

I understand the motivation – nobody wants a zombie WG that shambles along forever without dying – but I think the concern is no longer warranted; we’re not scared of PKIX-Redux any more.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email