Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Wed, 11 September 2019 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87C31201E4 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCHBb8Bgudsl for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D3F12081B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:42:58 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>, 'LAMPS WG' <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <3DB1B550-26FA-4F93-8CFA-434C1F8811D1@vigilsec.com> <F40D7FDE-207C-4CE0-8DFA-AAC1015CAA7A@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <F40D7FDE-207C-4CE0-8DFA-AAC1015CAA7A@vigilsec.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:42:57 -0700
Message-ID: <007201d568d9$1ded2390$59c76ab0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQJvVAnk/CB0xTANRsCye1KxYOkgewIP228rpeKLIVA=
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/QQFzKb2iQM-A51phw6_enURvE5s>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 19:43:08 -0000

Given that we have found several clarification locations, I think this is
good text.

Jim


-----Original Message-----
From: Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Russ Housley
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:17 PM
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications

I am concerned that we have heard from very few people on this topic, with
roughly equal numbers speaking for, against, and indifferent.  If you have
not spoken, please do so.

Russ

> On Jul 27, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> At the meeting in Montreal, we suggested a charter update to allow
clarifications.  I suggest:
> 
> OLD:
> 
> In addition, the LAMPS WG may investigate other updates to documents 
> produced by the PKIX and S/MIME WGs, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt 
> any of these potential work items without rechartering.
> 
> NEW:
> 
> In addition, the LAMPS WG may investigate other updates to documents 
> produced by the PKIX and S/MIME WG. The LAMPS WG may produce 
> clarifications where needed, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt anything 
> beyond clarifications without rechartering.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Russ

_______________________________________________
Spasm mailing list
Spasm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm