IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications

Daniel McCarney <cpu@letsencrypt.org> Thu, 12 September 2019 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dmccarney@letsencrypt.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A83812007C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=letsencrypt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKlRBUBzz8p3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6D7E120041 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id q18so77693wmq.3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=letsencrypt.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=F/qGXD+4LAwPHX3e8S08qMlbwAPFRynJ8WylVSejMd0=; b=AZ08YGI12kF5QYPKUAMo2nP5DoUFdY/2zMZ8TluuS6po9p5dYO/5OE3UckNw/JfEyQ o/iDL5oYyIYKUCc2Chewmy+QCtgP2lJ+h5TnfaWX4xkzckLTToQXjYSaY1aRvTY0sAuY wi25UxLtfEN7Ox/Km7t8qnwb9vv+O759m9Fvg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F/qGXD+4LAwPHX3e8S08qMlbwAPFRynJ8WylVSejMd0=; b=KYWPHJwMVMPpLWShT0GPyF1ZfF8yT7frLbHq3V4ks+G6G16isy5jBTBbnwLz2X5q9w oZJsjn3r5yfjT7QK2j+6ZU/FFeoJjZ48ISCwJWJzWHFhlOF9xpi9otjlHeIztgjDblVW mN5KhYnJpl3B2SfxzqahS1n+lzzSB/uZ1HB2AHNl9M27vNtP/zgndh24del+a5PRHeEu zTcQn0Wbq10eSFrBy9qimuVjDQ9r/HgavT9sUXXjhrTmSzDqmO146ftN+QFYRs98Ncdc IkEHAb45dlJhifDRhe0IF/6rlB10BUmG3Uf5yqeyjcctPh6XAF/3TDBkRerWG8uere0N 5Q/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWazQjKh773tL3g+opBHqrlZmp3qMdVJq+gaodCWP0O/yly4Gsv kVYWItjyWccEbrGcQBENTqtMOaKXL5gwp3CzU5gvTYrs
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmI6/oLp01zQvpgFQs38YuGys0LQrUdLXDXhwJGxyWQhwmxpI4TZ9iPXpNF88IXBJ+I/kPSDKYnT5M3CJ1Iw8=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2d85:: with SMTP id t127mr10893wmt.81.1568295299311; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3DB1B550-26FA-4F93-8CFA-434C1F8811D1@vigilsec.com> <F40D7FDE-207C-4CE0-8DFA-AAC1015CAA7A@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <F40D7FDE-207C-4CE0-8DFA-AAC1015CAA7A@vigilsec.com>
Reply-To: cpu@letsencrypt.org
From: Daniel McCarney <cpu@letsencrypt.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:34:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKnbcLifnNN8wNK4tOgOUq+w+nubsqjbORwfZ9B8LChwRw4umg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/iB3px1FurZ6hT5YzGSsuXDl8ZLg>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:35:03 -0000

I'm in favour of the new text.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:17 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>
> I am concerned that we have heard from very few people on this topic, with roughly equal numbers speaking for, against, and indifferent.  If you have not spoken, please do so.
>
> Russ
>
> > On Jul 27, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> >
> > At the meeting in Montreal, we suggested a charter update to allow clarifications.  I suggest:
> >
> > OLD:
> >
> > In addition, the LAMPS WG may investigate other updates to documents
> > produced by the PKIX and S/MIME WGs, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt
> > any of these potential work items without rechartering.
> >
> > NEW:
> >
> > In addition, the LAMPS WG may investigate other updates to documents
> > produced by the PKIX and S/MIME WG. The LAMPS WG may produce
> > clarifications where needed, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt
> > anything beyond clarifications without rechartering.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Russ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email