IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFFC12082A for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXVqu7q9Q8ex for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 494CD12011C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8C4300AB1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:07:37 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 7Lngd2a9B6xI for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:07:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08017300250 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:07:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:26:52 -0400
References: <3DB1B550-26FA-4F93-8CFA-434C1F8811D1@vigilsec.com>
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3DB1B550-26FA-4F93-8CFA-434C1F8811D1@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <944A9935-0A08-45E2-BD97-C21BF9EE18CF@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/LS48I9Hv3zw9aecsdmhrERbtph4>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 18:26:57 -0000

No many people have spoken.  I am assuming that is because many people take time off in August.  Right now roughly as many people support this addition as oppose it.  Please speak your mind.

Russ


> On Jul 27, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> At the meeting in Montreal, we suggested a charter update to allow clarifications.  I suggest:
> 
> OLD:
> 
> In addition, the LAMPS WG may investigate other updates to documents
> produced by the PKIX and S/MIME WGs, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt
> any of these potential work items without rechartering.
> 
> NEW:
> 
> In addition, the LAMPS WG may investigate other updates to documents
> produced by the PKIX and S/MIME WG. The LAMPS WG may produce
> clarifications where needed, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt
> anything beyond clarifications without rechartering.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email