IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 25 June 2019 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEA01207EC for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xHHQccV6csEq for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07915120075 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F43300A50 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:28:35 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id q5MaB1HInvml for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:28:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.5.245.234] (wsip-98-172-18-41.dc.dc.cox.net [98.172.18.41]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F4943004AF; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:28:33 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <F230A7DC-46F3-49B7-8062-801946B7B9DE@cooperw.in>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:47:49 -0400
Cc: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>, IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39F7F867-CDE2-478E-8934-7F8017003C75@vigilsec.com>
References: <155393972295.3950.3582710869606616692@ietfa.amsl.com> <B3508ACC-5F76-4205-B380-FC4D35A4496E@vigilsec.com> <e69cf276-8b93-3210-8eb3-a93fe68b6c9d@joelhalpern.com> <7916915C-76F6-4884-A0D4-FFAA2ABEEA21@cooperw.in> <55e454fa-0076-557f-b5b0-0f9dc0e91fdb@joelhalpern.com> <F230A7DC-46F3-49B7-8062-801946B7B9DE@cooperw.in>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/TdSH2_tF87wXHGxx6VaJ2Qv1Ywo>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:47:57 -0000

The remaining TBD identifiers will be assigned by IANA.

Russ


> On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:34 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> 
> Apologies, I thought the concern remained about the TBD identifiers in the document.
> Alissa
> 
>> On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The latest version (which I reviewed yesterday) has the assignments.
>> Joel
>> 
>> On 6/25/19 12:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>> Joel, thanks for your reviews. I entered a No Objection ballot. I trust that the identifier assignments will work out with NIST.
>>> Alissa
>>>> On Mar 31, 2019, at 1:28 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe a note that the assignment will take place once the drafts are approved, and that the RFC should coordiante with the authors and NIST on this?  (I presume we have done this before, and we do not have the problem we have in some other cases of "no number until RFC" / "no RFC until number".)
>>>> 
>>>> Yours,
>>>> Joel
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/31/19 1:21 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
>>>>>> On Mar 30, 2019, at 5:55 AM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>>>>>> Review result: Almost Ready
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>>>>>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>>>>>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>>>>>> like any other last call comments.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08
>>>>>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>>>>>> Review Date: 2019-03-30
>>>>>> IETF LC End Date: 2019-04-10
>>>>>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Major issues:
>>>>>>   One of the key points of this RFC seems to be to assign the identifiers for
>>>>>>   the use of the two SHAKE variants.  It is thus confusing that the
>>>>>>   identifiers end with "TBD", and thus are not defined in this document.
>>>>> They will be assigned by NIST once they are sure that these are the identifiers that we want.  This is much the same as we do when IANA is ti assign the identifier.
>>>>> Russ
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gen-art mailing list
>>>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email