Re: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Sat, 04 July 2020 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3E63A095A for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 03:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CVdPNWQ0HNV7 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 03:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32a.google.com (mail-ot1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9DE13A0957 for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 03:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id c25so10712015otf.7 for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AEOwA3iGX7LCoXQYcYI6OvFcFYCnz7UieIofjIgxpvY=; b=TBGPyI+T8RrXfz5xJcjbPVv3jZKFPaag2H6MxjbbTgn6EdFRGVs+V0xJ2e8FjXpTbP IeU+eu48Aw6H5B39eAmSHcyEAzzhMAE9yJ5t7VhdrFsZUJQoR1dSY+9fYNsJTtltMn/b wEtC1yDIkfHgXiDqMA+4h9JP9rHT6rGtzTGWu3xmZazMJtipAZGw+nU7KMngaS8ydc6p NCddUkHncHlZQ31f9tCYjQnx0LpbRsXUeTL3WGKFyY6Ap2Bm3KCrEDGta8Dh/IBhJwk7 GnwFvS4MNDriTnF+G/ki8Z1l9+0EUsK7SOyIIl5s9GeP1jukXC3AY1d+wUC/gM72zXp+ xhxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AEOwA3iGX7LCoXQYcYI6OvFcFYCnz7UieIofjIgxpvY=; b=WwACYBe1iLH4VgxxPXZyFy8naUnkXQchNHHky15Zvn1+PxBXwqOoQTSfCuG53mmAeN g0slNJAytLTP0n2aYQeU+rvu/r7KdvLYrw52XXAMf832ZUnl4G0KvgFmAGJ9OLMe9aBe TQgCAWQNk6T8GWxbj/opteYvGXL2JI0NX6TZ/CDxAdbhtt4r/cfb055CDs9Qkzg1mUWT IBXg7PPU9qmw7/DGkgAxhZ8Qbab00fUT0U9HCFKZDzNGsCMLZJy2IecC7zvQiW+hDQNR Hy8CdHyb4ZTd8JvHPccKSelVhBfDiMxnnayex4oji5TKKsGGt4PdVgglgaS3Ia4ylEuY TkJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/EIHGP/xhF69Lti2/HEFYyr6HvEopQwMersV2+AmO3fWZ40jN V/iylKY9MNIiUTEW/b0cjnT7gHx2iwqMBTmUDxM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvZIIGH9PF1rTTNtXFVHfgwdCKYiWIcJOnZTyRx2bLPgRnEndgrtP/Bwh4OagzYlSFRqKaOVQxwzH0H8UQi0w=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:22aa:: with SMTP id y39mr36016900ota.153.1593859193882; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E23B5DB3-F364-43CA-817E-DC6099B555AF@liquidtelecom.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D937AB113@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D937AB113@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 20:39:43 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2xbs=+K51=D5a5Am8-jsWZJ9uNw7AqGYaCFZcR64X2=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000012cda805a99b437b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/KGIuZhTKrL7P0Pxh4Ks_UO2wRdM>
Subject: Re: [spring] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiBJUHY2Kz8/?=
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 10:39:56 -0000

Where are the IPv6+ Internet Drafts?


On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 18:08 Lizhenbin, <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for your paying attention to the website. Please refer to my
> clarification.
>
>
>
> a. SRv6 is the technology based on IPv6. In the past 20+ years IPv6 has
> being deployed. One of the most important drives is the address space. The
> development of 5G and cloud proposes the new chances for the development
> and deployment of IPv6. Depending on the native IP reacheability and
> providing rich attributes based on the IPv6 extension headers, IPv6 can
> provide flexible connectivity to satisfy the requirements of 5G and cloud.
> SRv6 is the typical representative solutions. This makes this round of
> IPv6-based innovations and deployments shows the new characteristics of the
> times to some extent. Then IPv6+ concept is proposed.  It means the
> solutions is based on IPv6 and used for the scenarios of 5G and cloud.
>
>
> b. IPv6+  has nothing with the New IP. It is apparent that the solutions
> proposed in the IPv6+ are based on the IPv6 and all the standardization
> work is being done in IETF and has nothing with ITU-T.
>
>
>
> I am not sure if it is appropriate to discuss this work in the mailing
> list of SPRING WG.  More questions and comments can be sent to
> ipv6plus@outlook.com.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Robin
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *发件人:* spring [spring-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Andrew Alston [
> Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com]
> *发送时间:* 2020年7月4日 1:31
> *收件人:* spring@ietf.org
> *主题:* [spring] IPv6+??
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I came across this website: https://www.ipv6plus.net/
>
>
>
> Now, I wish to clarify a few things.
>
>
>
>    1. This website seems to imply – strong – that Srv6 is not infact IPv6
>    – but rather IPv6+ - is this the position of the member of this working
>    group or is this simply someones bizarre idea?
>
> [Robin
>
>    1. This site seems heavily related to the new ip stuff that was
>    presented to the ITU – does anyone here know if there is any actual
>    relation between this and that crowd?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>