IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??

James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com> Sat, 04 July 2020 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB263A0A8C for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 04:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=futurewei.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XukWbrIUmbWd for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 04:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam10on2133.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.93.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E473A0A8B for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 04:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GMhCe4SA/R0TmbwbokeMwSSIZAcJfhuk7UWzQPt3RlkbkBH8hCRjZhpnTvYEgn4YBloH3GLDJr2zl9xVfCGb/UT5oSA1hlDl6PCVceO9I2gdlQsjAbemVeqNZuhebFtkmwXIEoyDAMQMcvOQl0p7elcgnW/VWG1L8rjFS20GySiZ4hYmQ1APa1/6mD581pGfhUhy1h6XLiXU8SVl6TvFLSFxlCjmhv9D6NJ+D2IWfrTPd13psfzAlA67s0L+64qnH6/vVg2ma+31R0imIKHtu12vxqgpIQwE4pKnac00N7cu4FGs62uMxsPMhTUvK2cksF6OZRX+jNx/42wr6r8hUQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=n/8HjNuK5VnmjuVVWWYdU0zBLG7lNRTVNYj4KJSG8W4=; b=B3SoaxNPaHMPpl8TzDPD1H4FWzw7Jzdk3+YhcrKAR3lITwcyc1nFyN9C9azXBQXP/G3ZXQAnBv35jngKQd9dpI3IodX9lWwtXUi0RGmvAfWX3dr5Cgl+s/GgkwvIykn0auXIqdyRkd/UFIMsLnsWlXQpbOG37fv6sAhSvSK8GmtTjDkbWJY/JlHRm7OP2YVWtuuoeyGB+JmPOrpdgoQDEPENZgtjC7W7dTGJMhGFVyTECXe+TI+o3WofB44z9PR4Iy32komyU0lhhXhSrNDVXel2HpPdV/x/e6YvZQPfxlyMsDRx+IdBVeq5M/DE3l+4naOgdpL1pWMFzrXJgbh74w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=futurewei.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=futurewei.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurewei.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Futurewei.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=n/8HjNuK5VnmjuVVWWYdU0zBLG7lNRTVNYj4KJSG8W4=; b=PpuX2jamzWs7Dn/hAUEpU4DgU4KZwJIdqLvnjB2C+9RYf/3sfQ2Up1dk1X5pgsRoSqwBUINg6UJJQ9UUxNaU7CJsqk2k6sGEOF0/aCqLCmZV8/+aU6Qkt1v3LSIJmr4Sekkqfe22Cr0ieweLPjFOpxI3cip7GKkH46AxAQUp0Hg=
Received: from DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:19d::18) by DM6PR13MB2889.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:146::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3174.15; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 11:51:04 +0000
Received: from DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a024:eb2c:7574:b7b7]) by DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a024:eb2c:7574:b7b7%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3174.017; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 11:51:04 +0000
From: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
To: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
CC: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
Thread-Topic: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??
Thread-Index: AQHWUV/XdivlUhERMkWwlNxvQxGzYqj3D6ajgAAsdYCAAANVgIAADsLA
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 11:51:04 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR13MB30662CB5B73444A55889D309D26B0@DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <E23B5DB3-F364-43CA-817E-DC6099B555AF@liquidtelecom.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D937AB113@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAO42Z2xbs=+K51=D5a5Am8-jsWZJ9uNw7AqGYaCFZcR64X2=Sg@mail.gmail.com> <2712885247024880942670708370826b@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <2712885247024880942670708370826b@att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: att.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;att.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=futurewei.com;
x-originating-ip: [47.14.47.233]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 293d4e7b-97d6-48a7-e19b-08d8201087f9
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR13MB2889:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR13MB2889D23AD8362950F8829FF7D26B0@DM6PR13MB2889.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: hEcZABzGfLPSgsK+xHG6JMtc/C4nUAEjR0uo1n1oUW6vF4c1V9jWs1gHmSEJ7lquFmzDN6jt28h0RRk24xRAQ19QTLK7ojcr0uTALPZki+/l5nH/g1uNapt0nhsLzNHlL96GC/ZpDly/jRKNI0ntwh5twzoHYX0hKfdAuV3ahFVOOI+zTQTDvu52ctmoLl47lot4m9txsrANQqsb3PKXgtWPDYHW2gq9w52zFbWMC+jf6Pp2+Jwt8rXj8NH8HQaCoNsvX1o4hZpPknRFh1YhBbz0DvW01xHLgiNIqQBzMTADq33wwj3XWS8Qt9isy2EPAdPNkLn2iKyxb+TXhLitIglRchdmr4Ilxw6fdN9IeCNdb5STAQPwkZyr20GMQJepmP/Hza9XzLLTtKWbwlfOBA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(376002)(136003)(366004)(346002)(39840400004)(396003)(224303003)(2906002)(5660300002)(52536014)(45080400002)(966005)(478600001)(66574015)(54906003)(86362001)(110136005)(316002)(53546011)(33656002)(6506007)(7696005)(55016002)(9686003)(26005)(186003)(8936002)(4326008)(66946007)(64756008)(66446008)(76116006)(66556008)(66476007)(166002)(71200400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: rKIPnk4Sv9GJVWoLeS/FsWU9cyoRHMnSyc3sKx/qGQfcBkGyvsY0164sNJGGjzjj+KP4gl7sTVu7d5wtpkDhS1L09mu+M/rEovo+KoFweAFOVDQ6rA00U3bXMZ2gFdwYTo3pGn+cJRhDaEEW7VmrfUiPnkFUtgSGRFQxKa3EWcYSgBEujedCwq1IynK5dodqLwSFd0dCqn21TOynOlDiEeduzMd169TDgKa504joul3jkj9sNI0EFwBg0cs1aTnyKyS1PyhuPxKSuL82z4ievBv4IHeBQrN81q2aKE8TZw8RSwT56gl/E92h9ur19jpfM22QimQXzqtEKfi6qBgzGIBFKJGGp3qudLMk0DanqdGW2E0juGovqyWOd/1a5ijGUGVUJFtV19g2iklT707ZS83bhpAm02qoVZt30dXRrwZpJJUf8ljAcpU++QZniQ9NEP4niq9Ytp5K4pdaXYEbB9jis8RbTcVJWUnfhBRy92U=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR13MB30662CB5B73444A55889D309D26B0DM6PR13MB3066namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Futurewei.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 293d4e7b-97d6-48a7-e19b-08d8201087f9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Jul 2020 11:51:04.4781 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0fee8ff2-a3b2-4018-9c75-3a1d5591fedc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: IuyWeLZaNWDfDAJsIFWdYwn8PvUvp7WNdJxaNr4h0yQTylgXqZxS6W6qBPzwEkk5rb3FK6VEKQi3tMzNzY4h4A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR13MB2889
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/stLGo2TEbO6DfmJl20197id9mfA>
Subject: Re: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 11:51:10 -0000

Folks:

As one of the SPRING chairs I would like to point out that this website is not sanctioned by, or have anything to do with SPRING, and therefore we should not use the mailing list for any discussion about it; as pointed out below there is an email address provided for questions so please use that.

Thanks!

Jim



From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of UTTARO, JAMES
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2020 6:52 AM
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>; Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>; Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??

Where are the requirements.. I mean actual ones..

Thanks,
              Jim Uttaro

From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2020 6:40 AM
To: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com<mailto:lizhenbin@huawei.com>>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>; Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com<mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>>
Subject: Re: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??

Where are the IPv6+ Internet Drafts?


On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 18:08 Lizhenbin, <lizhenbin@huawei.com<mailto:lizhenbin@huawei.com>> wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for your paying attention to the website. Please refer to my clarification.



a. SRv6 is the technology based on IPv6. In the past 20+ years IPv6 has being deployed. One of the most important drives is the address space. The development of 5G and cloud proposes the new chances for the development and deployment of IPv6. Depending on the native IP reacheability and providing rich attributes based on the IPv6 extension headers, IPv6 can provide flexible connectivity to satisfy the requirements of 5G and cloud. SRv6 is the typical representative solutions. This makes this round of IPv6-based innovations and deployments shows the new characteristics of the times to some extent. Then IPv6+ concept is proposed.  It means the solutions is based on IPv6 and used for the scenarios of 5G and cloud.

b. IPv6+  has nothing with the New IP. It is apparent that the solutions proposed in the IPv6+ are based on the IPv6 and all the standardization work is being done in IETF and has nothing with ITU-T.



I am not sure if it is appropriate to discuss this work in the mailing list of SPRING WG.  More questions and comments can be sent to ipv6plus@outlook.com<mailto:ipv6plus@outlook.com>.





Best Regards,

Robin







________________________________
发件人: spring [spring-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org>] 代表 Andrew Alston [Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com<mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>]
发送时间: 2020年7月4日 1:31
收件人: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
主题: [spring] IPv6+??
Hi All,

I came across this website: https://www.ipv6plus.net/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__www.ipv6plus.net_%26d%3DDwMFaQ%26c%3DLFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg%26r%3Ds7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q%26m%3DxY6EacJ5lx2Wdodq3HVdOJnLu47yv-NeOtF_pims9wo%26s%3DMRwEZihBF6LGmyvanssazkk5goh92USabH9rzxSuIcg%26e%3D&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C09aaf448e0dc4f9a74b008d820084c4e%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637294567316076979&sdata=3%2B1WoB9DoVG1z4JTFCjoVlSLKxXabockUalTp9Qq0LE%3D&reserved=0>

Now, I wish to clarify a few things.


  1.  This website seems to imply – strong – that Srv6 is not infact IPv6 – but rather IPv6+ - is this the position of the member of this working group or is this simply someones bizarre idea?

[Robin

  1.  This site seems heavily related to the new ip stuff that was presented to the ITU – does anyone here know if there is any actual relation between this and that crowd?

Thanks

Andrew

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_spring%26d%3DDwMFaQ%26c%3DLFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg%26r%3Ds7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q%26m%3DxY6EacJ5lx2Wdodq3HVdOJnLu47yv-NeOtF_pims9wo%26s%3Db-d6W4ys7Vc5jHULav7uoajVG1yo_F5vTpaluGS1eIw%26e%3D&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C09aaf448e0dc4f9a74b008d820084c4e%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637294567316076979&sdata=tznPj8R1L2pct3vCbidzV6Opkoe7CcyWTKnuVhHLaHU%3D&reserved=0>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email