Re: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Sun, 05 July 2020 01:15 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2751F3A12EC for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 18:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TlDYv-Eji8er for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 18:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x235.google.com (mail-oi1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776AC3A077D for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 18:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x235.google.com with SMTP id t4so11590149oij.9 for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 18:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KbCHONAdSo7dCmhmtQAQnOMiV0J548oRa6uhc0pHkMw=; b=A2E+9681g+hgZ21p8YatBOC2jKjOmOqebPuitP4jGJqsYW3ut2yFAQVSfNvMA+khYP BDVlb0scYnmEaLcfdCOCsM3T1ob+pxwWr/anpNPqo4V059Vr2/cpweKPJEEPTosI6pc8 FweWwmaqsNadFDZak3kpTbp9XY8/DfDPCY8BdbI2U8L/baKa0rk3AsruDm1JCrrscY3V ie7ifWnEeAYLN0kIQ4EmJtDVcnR922J8uEgc+sH+HH1KF4j51YIUahCNqIxaE1xifXuz hyTODrP20yXF+Q0gL5oC4gAtjLF5LHB99l36wWELHVH4BloORWDaMN126cZfXmkvD1Da ZTjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KbCHONAdSo7dCmhmtQAQnOMiV0J548oRa6uhc0pHkMw=; b=R24uULRCwQHCyRkDyRd8gMWAiflWjB27mO+IyjN9LWg8/SUlH2VwiKcxiDCQ89uyW+ owQQ9olm68fBzV6QfyYkmRWkk0TxiiKVFOWG/hvF2nmNY8ADB+Ey3IGrpoSRMDdtuxdi 4DMb1nuaB8F5lqMww/aYzb/mrPb77gCfMTu9t/YCwgUkkFGA1QS2/+Bu6t5UakXzccVQ GzFcOkZuejNez/6+SFd50tUruzARN/wGh3RBZvNAojGy5OxLXZ4jg/QO4EBXjG9npJni IYPUfEGOVsfl9KYGtCf4SozlUm2O37p7GPXnDJIdGjnHqIlNWMD/iElaFYRSytTZd2ge Kcww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AMfT2zuqm0ROKGB1ioGjJaWUm5aUBar9wc22791xkI8Cj64T9 QzhQZ1CT0SYxi6sqvpKbDzHwIzEXtar6Y1N5/IE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQ4z1HoO34iAB/1PmczEmL8ygZkfjlNTf0gdx8Jz8PeHt4OcsVfT4kLWsEzEd+edr0/vdZKtC2634KHIThcRI=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:50d5:: with SMTP id e204mr27837819oib.60.1593911741710; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 18:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E23B5DB3-F364-43CA-817E-DC6099B555AF@liquidtelecom.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D937AB113@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAO42Z2xbs=+K51=D5a5Am8-jsWZJ9uNw7AqGYaCFZcR64X2=Sg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MME4JcxQPR8ZPzgPQN3YrYoMCLvhn9ktiBP4SwdPaxVKaQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MME4JcxQPR8ZPzgPQN3YrYoMCLvhn9ktiBP4SwdPaxVKaQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 11:15:31 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2zcUEahLyRC_5jVkYWy94EVNDdfvaFNWokhMYPphg8F8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002b04e605a9a77f6e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/wXvXXQZPt2austsmxLOO36Humz0>
Subject: Re: [spring] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiBJUHY2Kz8/?=
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 01:15:44 -0000

On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 22:04 Robert Raszuk, <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:

> All,
>
> It looks to me that "IPv6+" is just a marketing name to sell a bunch of
> new IPv6 based services and has nothing to do with SPRING nor for that
> matter with IETF.
>

The name implies it is a major development effort to extend IPv6, and that
implies IETF affiliation.

Heard about SPRING++ project yet?

Think about what you would assume and how you might act regarding your
SPRING deployment plans if you'd just heard about it now.



> As such unless anyone has copyrights on that specific ASCII string any
> vendor can use it as it seems fit their marketing strategy.
>

> Likewise others could still use other similar technology marketing or
> product names "IPv6^6", "IPv6NG", "IPv6@5G" etc ...
>

Of those, only 'IPv6@5G' doesn't imply extending IPv6.



> Cheers,
> R.
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 12:40 PM Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Where are the IPv6+ Internet Drafts?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 18:08 Lizhenbin, <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your paying attention to the website. Please refer to my
>>> clarification.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> a. SRv6 is the technology based on IPv6. In the past 20+ years IPv6 has
>>> being deployed. One of the most important drives is the address space. The
>>> development of 5G and cloud proposes the new chances for the development
>>> and deployment of IPv6. Depending on the native IP reacheability and
>>> providing rich attributes based on the IPv6 extension headers, IPv6 can
>>> provide flexible connectivity to satisfy the requirements of 5G and cloud.
>>> SRv6 is the typical representative solutions. This makes this round of
>>> IPv6-based innovations and deployments shows the new characteristics of the
>>> times to some extent. Then IPv6+ concept is proposed.  It means the
>>> solutions is based on IPv6 and used for the scenarios of 5G and cloud.
>>>
>>>
>>> b. IPv6+  has nothing with the New IP. It is apparent that the solutions
>>> proposed in the IPv6+ are based on the IPv6 and all the standardization
>>> work is being done in IETF and has nothing with ITU-T.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am not sure if it is appropriate to discuss this work in the mailing
>>> list of SPRING WG.  More questions and comments can be sent to
>>> ipv6plus@outlook.com.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Robin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *发件人:* spring [spring-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Andrew Alston [
>>> Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com]
>>> *发送时间:* 2020年7月4日 1:31
>>> *收件人:* spring@ietf.org
>>> *主题:* [spring] IPv6+??
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I came across this website: https://www.ipv6plus.net/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, I wish to clarify a few things.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. This website seems to imply – strong – that Srv6 is not infact
>>>    IPv6 – but rather IPv6+ - is this the position of the member of this
>>>    working group or is this simply someones bizarre idea?
>>>
>>> [Robin
>>>
>>>    1. This site seems heavily related to the new ip stuff that was
>>>    presented to the ITU – does anyone here know if there is any actual
>>>    relation between this and that crowd?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spring mailing list
>>> spring@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spring mailing list
>> spring@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>>
>