Re: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??

On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 22:04 Robert Raszuk, <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:

> All,
>
> It looks to me that "IPv6+" is just a marketing name to sell a bunch of
> new IPv6 based services and has nothing to do with SPRING nor for that
> matter with IETF.
>

The name implies it is a major development effort to extend IPv6, and that
implies IETF affiliation.

Heard about SPRING++ project yet?

Think about what you would assume and how you might act regarding your
SPRING deployment plans if you'd just heard about it now.

> As such unless anyone has copyrights on that specific ASCII string any
> vendor can use it as it seems fit their marketing strategy.
>

> Likewise others could still use other similar technology marketing or
> product names "IPv6^6", "IPv6NG", "IPv6@5G" etc ...
>

Of those, only 'IPv6@5G' doesn't imply extending IPv6.

> Cheers,
> R.
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 12:40 PM Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Where are the IPv6+ Internet Drafts?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 18:08 Lizhenbin, <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your paying attention to the website. Please refer to my
>>> clarification.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> a. SRv6 is the technology based on IPv6. In the past 20+ years IPv6 has
>>> being deployed. One of the most important drives is the address space. The
>>> development of 5G and cloud proposes the new chances for the development
>>> and deployment of IPv6. Depending on the native IP reacheability and
>>> providing rich attributes based on the IPv6 extension headers, IPv6 can
>>> provide flexible connectivity to satisfy the requirements of 5G and cloud.
>>> SRv6 is the typical representative solutions. This makes this round of
>>> IPv6-based innovations and deployments shows the new characteristics of the
>>> times to some extent. Then IPv6+ concept is proposed.  It means the
>>> solutions is based on IPv6 and used for the scenarios of 5G and cloud.
>>>
>>>
>>> b. IPv6+  has nothing with the New IP. It is apparent that the solutions
>>> proposed in the IPv6+ are based on the IPv6 and all the standardization
>>> work is being done in IETF and has nothing with ITU-T.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am not sure if it is appropriate to discuss this work in the mailing
>>> list of SPRING WG.  More questions and comments can be sent to
>>> ipv6plus@outlook.com.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Robin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *发件人:* spring [spring-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Andrew Alston [
>>> Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com]
>>> *发送时间:* 2020年7月4日 1:31
>>> *收件人:* spring@ietf.org
>>> *主题:* [spring] IPv6+??
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I came across this website: https://www.ipv6plus.net/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, I wish to clarify a few things.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. This website seems to imply – strong – that Srv6 is not infact
>>>    IPv6 – but rather IPv6+ - is this the position of the member of this
>>>    working group or is this simply someones bizarre idea?
>>>
>>> [Robin
>>>
>>>    1. This site seems heavily related to the new ip stuff that was
>>>    presented to the ITU – does anyone here know if there is any actual
>>>    relation between this and that crowd?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spring mailing list
>>> spring@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spring mailing list
>> spring@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>>
>