Re: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sat, 04 July 2020 12:04 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3253A0AB9 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 05:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kqK6gsuLMuiV for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 05:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C213D3A0AAF for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 05:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id p20so37122619ejd.13 for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 05:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YbYncLVyByeAga/wjN/yFKKr/+W1hcRBPpaK2XcqA7M=; b=CkKbektL28el4V/h1NB+/5uVEbFpmXXV0/bP75UCLLAOWpkKBFre7NLVMbg+Jf4+ur +lWSHXa33GeZdjKgL2OdB4iIa1b1SgTIwr7oM5Jc+34drH49PhBshatVAVEWpwy3tdk/ lzYNMJ7uOOe3mmKEjJsRLCdMHgnBeFYmeslnPH3P/Vi9jmjvNKoXCryTAkXiGNdG4siq mUVPiKpfRz+g2iROnRmiehsgmlIyY5eNieiF8+7FF9oOaVWI0JGPXhylnrKY5XcDomzB QxjXZfmMBvalY+ZrDiUnRYYL05DqQ9/qmQ4s+YNEZuBOVJez4HOeinLjvj99dPYHLUA4 jylA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YbYncLVyByeAga/wjN/yFKKr/+W1hcRBPpaK2XcqA7M=; b=itUxBhuJGu0JE0SQVtwA79cP/4UzWQuDUrVwTa08M7WVeOas7L7p3KFHbVMp6z8cnY LYi+CeV3BIH8u8G9H9dCyRhzYoYk6D+m5pMeItNF0AAwQyxFrJFCf6zjdfYPbNwkxS4m iW/aJFtfelyopgaN0qjzdCfSCqPo/X0NGnUZxukvPp372eNL/OnAwLwkDfGl+CW6QNCg 8Auy6XEQH2YXsmjVojcXGTGSvbKkRr8+Oq/L1AF6xUTd1/5VKk/ODGqW6yN9zzbtPWnH I81cOr+mTnq7zOCrG5eSatH9aLA9xBPCNdQPyG0SS789UjJpZMVDeFYf55ihaF7Av1mZ i+cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329dRHCvogu+Pcgr+UXlRjmKke08POiCq1XfmdHSTT5Yl79l0zV DZryURLta2s/vjU0NMtQXZhWvpcfa0OZPiMFDHASRw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwx8cWD0DyqrTpaDggol+Drj+U0y/pefhD6ASSlTxWSf9eccLGWwFMeXy7wQOKy9qCF182SbaAewNxuoWcKRDo=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e210:: with SMTP id gf16mr26923860ejb.386.1593864277025; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 05:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E23B5DB3-F364-43CA-817E-DC6099B555AF@liquidtelecom.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D937AB113@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAO42Z2xbs=+K51=D5a5Am8-jsWZJ9uNw7AqGYaCFZcR64X2=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2xbs=+K51=D5a5Am8-jsWZJ9uNw7AqGYaCFZcR64X2=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:04:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MME4JcxQPR8ZPzgPQN3YrYoMCLvhn9ktiBP4SwdPaxVKaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000d7a4c05a99c72e3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/nOkj30V8IH8UqgKzQGW7DVVuu2I>
Subject: Re: [spring] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiBJUHY2Kz8/?=
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:04:41 -0000

All,

It looks to me that "IPv6+" is just a marketing name to sell a bunch of new
IPv6 based services and has nothing to do with SPRING nor for that matter
with IETF.

As such unless anyone has copyrights on that specific ASCII string any
vendor can use it as it seems fit their marketing strategy.

Likewise others could still use other similar technology marketing or
product names "IPv6^6", "IPv6NG", "IPv6@5G" etc ...

Cheers,
R.


On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 12:40 PM Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:

> Where are the IPv6+ Internet Drafts?
>
>
> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 18:08 Lizhenbin, <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Thanks for your paying attention to the website. Please refer to my
>> clarification.
>>
>>
>>
>> a. SRv6 is the technology based on IPv6. In the past 20+ years IPv6 has
>> being deployed. One of the most important drives is the address space. The
>> development of 5G and cloud proposes the new chances for the development
>> and deployment of IPv6. Depending on the native IP reacheability and
>> providing rich attributes based on the IPv6 extension headers, IPv6 can
>> provide flexible connectivity to satisfy the requirements of 5G and cloud.
>> SRv6 is the typical representative solutions. This makes this round of
>> IPv6-based innovations and deployments shows the new characteristics of the
>> times to some extent. Then IPv6+ concept is proposed.  It means the
>> solutions is based on IPv6 and used for the scenarios of 5G and cloud.
>>
>>
>> b. IPv6+  has nothing with the New IP. It is apparent that the solutions
>> proposed in the IPv6+ are based on the IPv6 and all the standardization
>> work is being done in IETF and has nothing with ITU-T.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not sure if it is appropriate to discuss this work in the mailing
>> list of SPRING WG.  More questions and comments can be sent to
>> ipv6plus@outlook.com.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Robin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *发件人:* spring [spring-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Andrew Alston [
>> Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com]
>> *发送时间:* 2020年7月4日 1:31
>> *收件人:* spring@ietf.org
>> *主题:* [spring] IPv6+??
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I came across this website: https://www.ipv6plus.net/
>>
>>
>>
>> Now, I wish to clarify a few things.
>>
>>
>>
>>    1. This website seems to imply – strong – that Srv6 is not infact
>>    IPv6 – but rather IPv6+ - is this the position of the member of this
>>    working group or is this simply someones bizarre idea?
>>
>> [Robin
>>
>>    1. This site seems heavily related to the new ip stuff that was
>>    presented to the ITU – does anyone here know if there is any actual
>>    relation between this and that crowd?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spring mailing list
>> spring@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>