Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)

Feng Yang <yangfeng@chinamobile.com> Sun, 18 February 2024 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <yangfeng@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F52BC14F5F2 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 00:35:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GcJjERGJ30yg for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 00:35:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta8.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.151]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADEFC14F5E8 for <spring@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 00:35:22 -0800 (PST)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee265d1c13a222-ec551; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 16:35:07 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee265d1c13a222-ec551
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from [10.2.147.2] (unknown[10.2.147.2]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee165d1c13a2a1-f6168; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 16:35:07 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee165d1c13a2a1-f6168
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------lugZBMJrsYopXP0D8r0V30N5"
Message-ID: <c47be394-e524-4c82-a777-61178abbd393@chinamobile.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 16:35:25 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: spring@ietf.org
References: <CABY-gOMQ=LaECWJsJHsdKX7i+BUsiX=LF5b5ZPMVp=3qQjZ8Mg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABY-gOMQ=LaECWJsJHsdKX7i+BUsiX=LF5b5ZPMVp=3qQjZ8Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/TcGTNpUyz5PF_bqg6XuoVyRiFWE>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 08:35:28 -0000

Hi,

Support.

This is a simple, fast, verified solution for tail end protection.

在 2024-02-10 03:30, Yingzhen Qu 写道:
> Hi, This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following 
> draft: draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-05 - SRv6 
> Egress Protection in Multi-homed scenario (ietf.org) 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection/> 
> Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by 
> Feb 24th, 2024.
> Please note that there is an existing WG 
> document:draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-16 - SRv6 Path Egress 
> Protection 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection/> 
> Which proposes fast protections for the egress node and link of an 
> SRv6 path through extending IGP and using Mirror SID. As you discuss 
> adopting draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection, please 
> also consider:
>
>   * Do we need these different solutions?
>   * Technical merits and drawbacks of each solution
>   * If there is any implementation of the proposals, please voice it.
> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware 
> of any IPR that applies to the draft.
> Also copying SPRING WG.
> Thanks, Yingzhen (RTGWG Co-chair)
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

-- 
BR,
Feng Yang (杨锋)