IETF Logo Mail Archive

[spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 09 February 2024 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7299CC14F5ED; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:30:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J84y5D_Aqy56; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:30:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71C39C14F61F; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:30:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2cf3ed3b917so15094831fa.1; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 11:30:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1707507031; x=1708111831; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/3SHMxPkESAM7gAd15DAjdKE2DAZQ7vbmWG8zBaRJ5k=; b=AIGnBcQ+/AWXs4vfwU1PKG/KgZMbOOmdDJkPJWHlPKXnsqNHnBXK5gBssuIBrNjndb 5ne8kDgtT0sgvWBbCk3bvWLtjaKyB97ELD3VBq8OOqhP9IYq/4NnxTWPZAD3P8Y8YQ4g WE8hdJjYyUhAlikQdKoAtd/HggTWHEWIFL5jZ3ab4kWuQyxPAgClXvWFEGPMCYsDF66X uJ3cwtfCwSx/YRzyGoBo065stS3Cq5PQAmEWgb+HqAMhB5IgzuK1hczAZlKtgemaL9ZY Fxe1M8LwKIsEO4IfPdYky24RNXCacfU5g1d9pkhcYkI+UEYlqOVKrT2QgIBAX5y/YlTo Idzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707507031; x=1708111831; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/3SHMxPkESAM7gAd15DAjdKE2DAZQ7vbmWG8zBaRJ5k=; b=TOulBn9xBVpCy3y9blNEkdLoc9WFvkEPq6w5050CeRQi2jkXPlDpLwog8cTCHYq2QD tMoYmlODu0QulCQsIwvf/5xPlACTZW5PQikV1zNOQK3ZRgWUKbvBcDmT/MQMciBhOeV1 9miMI5e/xqsWyloGcoANpd+L7eCqOxltyIOvYEasDV2iHgeETtM3OA6g+LfiVzo/XE6K JOSzYRiJOtLf/1E/VjR38BDMD+c2mhX7/5ryhcQI2cyshe2Kk7bzP1ClrZaUNvLR1eC4 Hz0W3eVkPQxFork/XVNriV7iMfVJ4tLsBBFxAbJ0LCWgGyKgcdkPy69p4yfx/2d1fQxU BPDg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU76TF7juDpMQXvIQrcujhphIka2L+PZlJGsFWsgEedvVcv+Y6O7ltpF4M/bdS/z0LPXiC8Vp6aU/Sv5M/xckzQACAfO9j1Aw3D+oGY8COZc7Jm2lTC15+SKeGDcQq4SzqdpNhEICe7moT4P4s60CBUC6Sbhwlfr5i+MoncCYbIOdePfM1RVjNoQTlHUJ8w8RY8xkQ=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwDF/EEP/8HWrhFJvlehTVXLrIIdJTuSeO2RMdoaFWGLM7U3nFO rybabOQNWGiiQbE7bNZmoW2Bb9/jJYshYKYCMTtnjcM6w2T0F7aW4EUza5BC3wC5+T4VgLGKK4C HgNu3MEGj7xzj2a4lXZ0aev9rmMflaFMQTg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFXAmKG7oa19V8pDHq6AUpvmWZtEWLcNLenby08GpLiVzhg09ttv5twMzyZ5VSKa4MvkTZWdc0yITIf7N6Br+k=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3808:0:b0:2d0:d95e:6b81 with SMTP id f8-20020a2e3808000000b002d0d95e6b81mr2197467lja.4.1707507030509; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 11:30:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 11:30:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CABY-gOMQ=LaECWJsJHsdKX7i+BUsiX=LF5b5ZPMVp=3qQjZ8Mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, spring@ietf.org, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection <draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000014b0e0610f7f67b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/u-QGsVRLTtnifiF-9Uezy3l1xnM>
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 19:30:40 -0000

Hi,

This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following
draft:draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-05 - SRv6
Egress Protection in Multi-homed scenario (ietf.org)
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection/>

Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by
Feb 24th, 2024.

Please note that there is an existing WG
document:draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-16 - SRv6 Path Egress
Protection <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection/>
Which proposes fast protections for the egress node and link of an
SRv6 path through extending IGP and using Mirror SID. As you discuss
adopting draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection, please
also consider:


   - Do we need these different solutions?
   - Technical merits and drawbacks of each solution
   - If there is any implementation of the proposals, please voice it.

Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware
of any IPR that applies to the draft.

Also copying SPRING WG.

Thanks,
Yingzhen (RTGWG Co-chair)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email