IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 18 February 2024 23:45 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56925C14F5FA; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:45:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lJf2BIvQPiH0; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95CC5C14F5F7; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d0cdbd67f0so53817741fa.3; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:45:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708299920; x=1708904720; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XMoo911jwggxG94ItcQ84ZiDnamtm0SJuWjKpAcN8zY=; b=KplMyT5g1MUBUhUMj/9Etqu2wtXaSBtsT8FfSc8/nKJMb/Ymxu4VT3nY7JrKXC45U6 kQJWXJ6oSpmC/+fcd44XEdZcpL/tz302/nJYgRopxzoDA12c4jh4BWXX2DR6yAjj4xb7 DuSc56Jut0CklCFgzSOZ9T+A/jNYiaSQGmDW39S/kt6s3M33NA7MXNuJCavZo+MXRaE+ KuGU0gGzY0zATcp3BfaZXM9tgZCkoPjfQfjI11CYQkOXZjYyMdxrmULg7lJ9z/0G9ClZ GB9ffLR9vB5YpJ+r3jX+2TOjsmyOTuxTL8uzU5uw1p4vpfHBIh37rA9SXM0CfC/KZphX dg7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708299920; x=1708904720; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=XMoo911jwggxG94ItcQ84ZiDnamtm0SJuWjKpAcN8zY=; b=dpBtJjBJiJQ6TKA7Iot/2tEtXbJsRx8sdgwcWYoOx5oF7TqTRS9axdqxiQoybPot5V n4dv/LtWH1Z5rS5QDqjvXwpLOJ/cZ7vwG7uN/NIKZwTnpy2rmqCu9F45qp+Kjj57FPbp y5NPK1+RssPPUI2GB4AXDtrglCxeLhzuAAQ6Vdq3BFHXoPB7H48PhQrnnmNfGDqR2x/J KW5CaYacKZoZgT1fslxSJeIGHhzldvqR2h0NxAV1hEOZGd2KWILK5rQ0Dlb2C/a27M/5 BhUjM7isLJkymHDEEh/eKlppKYVJWtpFA7GPG3YF/Ns8ZT2Lo+xyyMzTJ2TG9hXt8Gg9 4jyQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVWGlCLgmhlwBp+lnJa57u6MCfWljuO/3uAsHxNVN+CiwohcSJLFcVeKvjiYZZFM4YQSUU0IFaHLO9KuEx1rQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxcB7fEKkMm+cpVuWcEWM53eggKECr7EH5mTPKlTB+Weeh0uBDz S25MyLhbKCbiFC5qksSXZBjcLzhwzyUQXmY0tYmUZxmo/OT653knzD7dkOYgjqkHXWQt8j/A0IU tUJeWtTKeixJgB+KNG5wCzDIw196+Q1A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFFG8oX8Kqhs6KeKp9P+93CXHrVs7Dn+a31lIntjuy0RNdHoHRnp2JAxysuJJqy6ku4PfXPI6az1+6MugA7anM=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b58:0:b0:2d0:b1c0:d926 with SMTP id o24-20020a2e9b58000000b002d0b1c0d926mr7570823ljj.0.1708299920349; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:45:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABY-gOMQ=LaECWJsJHsdKX7i+BUsiX=LF5b5ZPMVp=3qQjZ8Mg@mail.gmail.com> <c47be394-e524-4c82-a777-61178abbd393@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <c47be394-e524-4c82-a777-61178abbd393@chinamobile.com>
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:45:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CABY-gOMS7eEysXuRqvH5+5rKJEKxTrBmEDP=aJh5L-5iDb_EyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Feng Yang <yangfeng@chinamobile.com>
Cc: spring@ietf.org, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ec1fb20611b09122"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/iDB4m1QN3aDiLmPbrxtrl0DOhBE>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 23:45:23 -0000

Hi,

You mentioned "verified solution", are you aware of any implementation or
deployment?

Thanks,
Yingzhen

On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:35 AM Feng Yang <yangfeng@chinamobile.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Support.
>
> This is a simple, fast, verified solution for tail end protection.
> 在 2024-02-10 03:30, Yingzhen Qu 写道:
>
> Hi,
>
> This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-05 - SRv6 Egress Protection in Multi-homed scenario (ietf.org) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection/>
>
> Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by Feb 24th, 2024.
>
> Please note that there is an existing WG document:draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-16 - SRv6 Path Egress Protection <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection/> Which proposes fast protections for the egress node and link of an SRv6 path through extending IGP and using Mirror SID. As you discuss adopting draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection, please also consider:
>
>
>    - Do we need these different solutions?
>    - Technical merits and drawbacks of each solution
>    - If there is any implementation of the proposals, please voice it.
>
> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft.
>
> Also copying SPRING WG.
>
> Thanks,
> Yingzhen (RTGWG Co-chair)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing listspring@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
> --
> BR,
> Feng Yang （杨锋）
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email