IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 March 2024 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078EAC14F71F; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:19:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OK5J_bBD7rOB; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F3C1C14F69E; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6e55b33ad14so3642776b3a.1; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:19:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709662785; x=1710267585; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+fpuJBLuelw9MNQNg2PtTlEgBavEvdcf9LEZgxkI0+0=; b=R1fefVPpUJOoh3X3JSVU/ST8KPIY04nBumK8156Bld6RwKTANIwk+gc0vJ4qm64PDL nTwi6Ym0MYf5ByNuqRf9cfn13WxJFVgIg5bm+8ff7iOc7jrjid8/glv81uzyAzhxClPd KiVhf1vpyXUNHSNtzJvGu9bpumYmON6ZlFHcBUe5MBOnlICTxMjWqrBA+qCefcG3OZ0g mimsmV+2lJJrUgY9+DdCl3sjw0tsPK3HQSHMJSJJ3oc0qu3MhMMxrmh0QNANmky9hKip Ku+zowlCawUvZ4cZZK+8XRJQJaWouLzfX+55CXcCigtl0ykIVs/tRXhCyHgTfjwnmhq0 lP5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709662785; x=1710267585; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+fpuJBLuelw9MNQNg2PtTlEgBavEvdcf9LEZgxkI0+0=; b=icudfqJwrTrPLClDSnUz/lIgpe5oZJ7gwt6gtgCy6gZBaUtGKZeZRqj6MIi9mFBffG VITtRJGfnXo2SDtxW2bR6dlgDTqzPcbAFG04mQcb8bAf8o9ZIvcteNbQXcP5DAHtDV/Z jzSsGbbwYIWUjVgzi7FmDd8MrFfdPt89okv6q5zaHAWyzR5Wy5W9JuSpTYk9g0Wij5rU pGkimsq4Rj9gvbQOPuf/hm3+Hr2hiKhnQ8zl2rW+mZJavH9OQVJUvTQR7UdINHRGSpMB xKB8kZGJXPGPxWeWu997horE5DqfKJhdFe3/Tp5gaB+F+H9sc59uHm+nbjzRHKpXVJlh FmbA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVVrEqg8MKrlerHXopu9C3MhskH2w1uNWemFvp3/FDGc55i/U30PB6JjuFui/fvpVZ3RsR7RJPPwKZX8okkPDuYTCNbkYQp6sBjiMj7SwstfSyPWxDi7JuF7Dud7Lo5czoHtNRt0cjjTerGCiLC05insFvJT8JRFJ71SInMODLIfgnOcCe/LuX189iWTmsiA5wMOGUlaAmFP8VsKlrUlIrRFf2PHoJIL4l62Jo=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywkh8AqUjOOz6N4ccavdpCY/vloPiqSUfO28oZ/XU5CgNdYZCIG xMYUhKig+9fluD85ytxrLUn8gu8lMhStuTxwZMxC+s9cNpBtFOBG0aO2kleMXzHviHy6wm53Mec SkwGWN03tXeni00jP8NQlPfJcKlvhR1eC
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEUxH25PYn2UrUSPvzffdhmFHJka6RoHGbEnx+Hy40J7jzGhsGXeoZtsQWdjIiuIQvcONAoV9RryTnN26Fhowo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3114:b0:1a0:a06e:41cf with SMTP id 20-20020a056a20311400b001a0a06e41cfmr1926210pzf.32.1709662785508; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:19:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:19:44 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <06e93149163e4e5fb749fe549b25db27@huawei.com>
References: <CABY-gOMQ=LaECWJsJHsdKX7i+BUsiX=LF5b5ZPMVp=3qQjZ8Mg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6gdPyuWV=xvDerDCtXnD1T5CGymsm+b1i-idRGEs1w9aui=A@mail.gmail.com> <CABY-gOPDLs6j+YPSYhbwnvvkfTi1VyPN8Vr6XWs9oy28cxr6Mw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESswGR=7Lm_3tGOtVfb2YBvihAGARSwthRe6CP2=8Y3BEhQ@mail.gmail.com> <06e93149163e4e5fb749fe549b25db27@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:19:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESszvaOi+ZPrOAX4i1sxQ8d=V2caRNuW0jB_d_174gh2Tiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>
Cc: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>, draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection <draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/WJThUBlGoUrfpZOlPQ2WPs2aS14>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 18:19:47 -0000

On March 4, 2024 at 6:46:33 AM, Huzhibo wrote:

Zhibo:

Hi!

...
> ----->HZB:rfc8754 or rfc8986 only defines that Processing is not changed by
> this document. This is only a general description of the standard SRv6, not a
> mandatory specification.

rfc8754 and rfc8986 are the SRv6 specifications!  Not changing the
behavior by not forwarding packets that con't have a corresponding FIB
entry is not a suggestion, it is the expected behavior.


> ----->HZB:Of course, as you said, the new endpoint behavior defined in this
> document has been posted to the Spring group discussion.

Maybe I missed that, can you please point me to the thread?



...
> -----> HZB :In normal operations...The specific operations of PE3 are as
> follows,This section does not describe the PSP endpoint behavior, but the
> VPN SID endpoint behavior.We will clarify in the next version.

Note that one of the concerns is that the behavior results in some of
the SIDs being skipped, its relationship to the current standards, and
the issues that it may bring up.


Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email