IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)

Peng Liu <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com> Wed, 21 February 2024 03:36 UTC

Return-Path: <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A04C151099; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:36:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i2kbudKdpY3W; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta6.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B653C15107F; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:36:42 -0800 (PST)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee565d56fb9136-829da; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:36:26 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee565d56fb9136-829da
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from CMCC-LP (unknown[10.2.53.236]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee765d56fb72d2-124f6; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:36:26 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee765d56fb72d2-124f6
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:36:53 +0800
From: Peng Liu <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
To: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, rtgwg <rtgwg@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection <draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection@ietf.org>
References: <CABY-gOMQ=LaECWJsJHsdKX7i+BUsiX=LF5b5ZPMVp=3qQjZ8Mg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: C9EA1378-C430-49F3-A5DC-AA96911F9B6A
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.21.453[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202402211136529458182@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart158606162764_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/YIQVQjxTrvSPgOLkEajp19jwjm4>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 03:36:50 -0000

Hi, 

I support the adoption. 

Regards,
Peng


liupengyjy@chinamobile.com
 
From: Yingzhen Qu
Date: 2024-02-10 03:30
To: RTGWG; spring; rtgwg-chairs; draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection
Subject: WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)
Hi,
This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-05 - SRv6 Egress Protection in Multi-homed scenario (ietf.org)
Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by Feb 24th, 2024.Please note that there is an existing WG document:draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-16 - SRv6 Path Egress Protection Which proposes fast protections for the egress node and link of an SRv6 path through extending IGP and using Mirror SID. As you discuss adopting draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection, please also consider:
Do we need these different solutions?
Technical merits and drawbacks of each solution
If there is any implementation of the proposals, please voice it.
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft.Also copying SPRING WG.Thanks,
Yingzhen (RTGWG Co-chair)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email