Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-11

["Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi working-group:

I support the adoption, and I have the following questions:

1. Section 4.1.4.2 and 4.2.2.2 depict the packet format with word "as needed" for inner IP Header.  Can authors please clarify in which case(s) it is needed and in which it is not.
2. Section 4.3.1 "Destination ipv6 address from the ::FFFF:127/104 range", and Section 4.1.4 "the loopback address ::1/128 for IPv6", are they different cases or same case ?

Thanks
Jingrong

From: spring [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 8:52 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-11

Dear WG:

This message starts a 3 week WG adoption call for document https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-11 ending November 12th 2020. Please note that this document has several changes from v-10 that were requested by the SPRING and IPPM chairs. For this reason, the chairs have extended the adoption call for an additional week to allow the WG enough time to review these changes before deciding on WG adoption.

Some background:

Several review comments were received previously for document https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-10. The SPRING and IPPM chairs considered those comments, and upon review of this version of the document, determined the following:


  *   The SPRING document should describe only the procedures relevant to SPRING with pointers to non-SPRING document/s that define any extensions. Several extensions including Control Code Field Extension for TWAMP Light Messages, Loss Measurement Query Message Extensions, and Loss Measurement Response Message Extensions were included in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-10 and should be removed from the SPRING document.
  *   The TWAMP extensions included in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-10 should be described in a new document published in the IPPM WG.

These conclusions were discussed with the authors of  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-10 the result of which is the publication of the following two documents:


  *   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-11. The subject of this WG adoption call.
  *   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm-00. This document will be progressed (if determined by the WG) within the IPPM WG.

After review of the SPRING document please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption to the mailing list. Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack thereof) as silence will not be considered as consent.

Finally, the chairs would like to thank the authors for their efforts in this matter.

Thanks!

Jim, Bruno, & Joel