Re: [spring] SRv6 compression

[Eduard Metz <[e-mail]>]

Agree.
The DT has done a great job in the analysis.

Moving forward with a single, standards track solution is
preferred/required for interoperable SRv6 implementations.

cheers,
  Eduard


On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 6:09 PM Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> For all operators around the world looking at deployment of SRv6
> compression and being in a  holding pattern waiting for SRv6 compression to
> be standardized by the IETF.
>
> Given the ubiquitous importance of SRV6 compression and MSD issues with
> long strict SR-TE explicit route object,  it is critical for
> interoperability for all steering use cases that exist today: enterprise,
> internet, private, access network - 5G wireless xHaul, mobile core,
> wireline, MBB, FBB.
>
> We as a WG need a single standardized solution for SRv6 compression for
> interoperability to work and all vendors marching to the same sheet of
> music.
>
> I agree that the NVO3 - GENEVE is a solid precedence path forward to take
> and for Spring WG to come to consensus and standardize on one solution and
> progress the other solutions as informational if implementations already
> exist.
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Gyan
> Verizon Inc
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:12 AM Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Same here. We want a single standard method of SID compression to allow
>> the WG to focus on finalizing it and get vendors hardware implementations
>> updated.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mustapha.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* spring <[e-mail]> *On Behalf Of *Rabadan, Jorge
>> (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:54 AM
>> *To:* Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <[e-mail]>;
>> [e-mail]
>> *Subject:* Re: [spring] SRv6 compression
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with Wim’s statement that the precedent in NVO3 **could** apply
>> here too: pick one solution as Standard’s track RFC, and once it is done,
>> the others might be documented as Informational RFCs if they have
>> implementations.
>>
>>
>>
>> That would help the industry to move forward.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *spring <[e-mail]> on behalf of Henderickx, Wim
>> (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <[e-mail]>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, July 27, 2021 at 9:11 AM
>> *To: *[e-mail] <[e-mail]>
>> *Subject: *[spring] SRv6 compression
>>
>> Given the design team accomplished the work on providing requirements and
>> analysis to compress an SRv6 SID list, I would recommend we pick 1 solution
>> similar to what was done in NVO3 (when we discussed GENEVE, GUE, GPE, etc)
>> given this has to be implemented in HW..
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope we can conclude on this asap and move forward on this topic
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spring mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>>
> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>
> *Email [e-mail] <[e-mail]>*
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>