Re: [spring] SRv6 compression

Eduard Metz <etmetz@gmail.com> Fri, 30 July 2021 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <etmetz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FCA3A26DD for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m4-nuXEYxsMk for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E8C3A26DC for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id m13so17197260lfg.13 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3DUx6L0yxMindrSlb6+fznckbe1Vjcel4Z+UEf+IBRM=; b=JkjjiTegDNBP9bzUhRv/4XDQjWDyfjcZLLARiiKkAeSvfN0cqlg9YqWhHIv7eJ55nk COO+wdwaQTLQ/8ZetHQNFsLZ0sHVoMiv3tW/z/Kkznv/JL1Jlx+cKIsHM8FSJgP3nxhM 8mPA/EyNZx1XxVrBbgV+mvLqE9g5orQz9EQOjYBfQbyYRuxgwG4l8QxbHytBAheofV0l mQxzJJQGqaPJvf07o8lXscHB2J6jCzj0gFIAnnO6T+0XvPZ+mN3EjgWIBxHDhvNPkFmP JRyOz66dsss9mBjMCOawgvGcIVoAwkVtsIJMs3Zuw3QxcjoQBhxH3e4C86Z87ebQLykV ewlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3DUx6L0yxMindrSlb6+fznckbe1Vjcel4Z+UEf+IBRM=; b=gANrLbfP4LWwGl23M9lOH5Q/VSZo9A0LXz0SwEhOgaMfkVc59MBbDwzKbfBe082S6G A2nEiMQnvhdSNhnsHOLbt4VdPjX6oh+/MpNlEY/b4bAqAUmPjmlGDPY/jUMDNbVo3fk5 R+Bgl9mrKIxpsJ+vS7cRfpeYFCKmkm1OEVHX7Rjf3srFVzKcM/laiTBDS+BmnqON+Jkn +eI5GEf2zPHshMhV/LUrRVJ0O28yk7DhIC8z4GGYxhhNf/ssmDDxGRB4vKWyzq4qF9dv ioG19ktGiG5m5WZyt3gJHpZQrqFhThDijousyyYi4yCcf9SF5etLsxA7MDxqDPqHEfb8 zmTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Rn4BOf3+Bwwne20I51widzHRzo3qSGCh6MK/dU/yO3fLLeXsV cd2i1ZohiK0nW9OUcHgR7aaG+j0i8S22ZWCEC44=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrJB0tBevW0sRauZkwB+MDqb4x7b6ZUmW/FkIAiCZitPQdkLuwA7neNw6j+a7ojod4Am4a23U/9TC2r+QObr4=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4197:: with SMTP id z23mr1523142lfh.435.1627644271797; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM0PR07MB44978A05B5BFCD3A0A79FD2D83E99@AM0PR07MB4497.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <BY3PR08MB706058AA99ADC757AA717982F7E99@BY3PR08MB7060.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <DM6PR08MB6027A0F55D0146ECDA8C8923E4E99@DM6PR08MB6027.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CABNhwV0DYH8xO_9T2HiKj_6rc3gh6c2PWFdP5XPjDma_yktPCg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV0DYH8xO_9T2HiKj_6rc3gh6c2PWFdP5XPjDma_yktPCg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eduard Metz <etmetz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:24:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG=3OHePBc6XebbgHdEkj9Si54B3CPFrV1sePuMbr6t9dciW8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: "Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <mustapha.aissaoui@nokia.com>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a42be505c8557665"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/yijv75PpCSQ9Ehgbg9DeV1Urrjo>
Subject: Re: [spring] SRv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 11:24:50 -0000

Agree.
The DT has done a great job in the analysis.

Moving forward with a single, standards track solution is
preferred/required for interoperable SRv6 implementations.

cheers,
  Eduard


On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 6:09 PM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> For all operators around the world looking at deployment of SRv6
> compression and being in a  holding pattern waiting for SRv6 compression to
> be standardized by the IETF.
>
> Given the ubiquitous importance of SRV6 compression and MSD issues with
> long strict SR-TE explicit route object,  it is critical for
> interoperability for all steering use cases that exist today: enterprise,
> internet, private, access network - 5G wireless xHaul, mobile core,
> wireline, MBB, FBB.
>
> We as a WG need a single standardized solution for SRv6 compression for
> interoperability to work and all vendors marching to the same sheet of
> music.
>
> I agree that the NVO3 - GENEVE is a solid precedence path forward to take
> and for Spring WG to come to consensus and standardize on one solution and
> progress the other solutions as informational if implementations already
> exist.
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Gyan
> Verizon Inc
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:12 AM Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <
> mustapha.aissaoui@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> Same here. We want a single standard method of SID compression to allow
>> the WG to focus on finalizing it and get vendors hardware implementations
>> updated.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mustapha.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Rabadan, Jorge
>> (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:54 AM
>> *To:* Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>om>;
>> spring@ietf.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [spring] SRv6 compression
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with Wim’s statement that the precedent in NVO3 **could** apply
>> here too: pick one solution as Standard’s track RFC, and once it is done,
>> the others might be documented as Informational RFCs if they have
>> implementations.
>>
>>
>>
>> That would help the industry to move forward.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Henderickx, Wim
>> (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, July 27, 2021 at 9:11 AM
>> *To: *spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>
>> *Subject: *[spring] SRv6 compression
>>
>> Given the design team accomplished the work on providing requirements and
>> analysis to compress an SRv6 SID list, I would recommend we pick 1 solution
>> similar to what was done in NVO3 (when we discussed GENEVE, GUE, GPE, etc)
>> given this has to be implemented in HW..
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope we can conclude on this asap and move forward on this topic
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spring mailing list
>> spring@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>>
> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>
> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>