IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] Review on -presence

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Wed, 14 August 2013 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754C121F9FDE for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.360, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TLNUB8B5ZEa0 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:212]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D090C21E80BD for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.43]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id CbWZ1m0020vyq2s5EftHuQ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:53:17 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id CftH1m00E3ZTu2S3RftH0M; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:53:17 +0000
Message-ID: <520BA7EC.6050604@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:53:16 +0200
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stox@ietf.org
References: <0CB65FBA-7262-4189-8852-5FC08A34D50D@ag-projects.com> <51F99063.30203@stpeter.im> <51FCC3C0.3040200@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <51FCC3C0.3040200@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1376495597; bh=BOBXLIWOQ51i1fVNrjlQ15DV16xbvm2rlc4gpWMNlO0=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=JTNY/2I8FxIzLdF6E3+UZig3b8dq34WskdGlWMqn6TLBXXh/7oO8Tw7FtN91HZiDs Y5Mn6MlsOn8g6T0LIAXVlmo2wmpLK0g+VbsUdaiQ8+Ra8eFI7Ju4rDGIAma22RLClu OR+NhF+ExRuffyy9Cmp1Wj/avR3qOXjSYNaMC4wz1xNHIFgAiyOjjCRF5tIogjETT8 SBtlmabScHIuRpS1da29bTnVlaGjovGIW5xXnxYMdGa6ic+8Or+KJ01wWP8aR4eg7W 86ElAXPujxTjt381rB+GnmIDdp6blTV3Z8nqqrXTIfW0G8+qvmf8aQDe6lKPWsjwZP +iiG7sSQ7TKlQ==
Subject: Re: [Stox] Review on -presence
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:53:27 -0000

On 8/3/13 10:48 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> (1) SIP user agent is online and generates a refresh by re-subscribing.
> In this case, the empty NOTIFY might make sense (although you could
> argue that it's not truly an "initial NOTIFY").

An initial notify is the one directly in response to a SUBSCRIBE, even a 
re-SUBSCRIBE. So I don't think there should be any controversy.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email