Re: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94

John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com> Mon, 26 October 2015 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <strazpdj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D291B3104 for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OPmRP7KsFkt2 for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1015B1B3130 for <supa@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkex70 with SMTP id x70so109466782vke.3 for <supa@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7pIKFdSc/9RVfNZRW4GxNE288yPuoLB5hm43YeLEGNo=; b=FzCoan8EJBUTwSJYYNWiRWB90nn4Q4Eigkj0M7aBVHA3YricFSikw88bzzi6l2YtOo UgGIEwx0RH8jgk/srMAX7yAxk8MiTn6tM2fG6E6MzhzmTAnxRN9TSUowkPpiB6gUGS8R WbZIxbS9haZBov1IohMsigXQq1Mn1SVlUL0s65F79LPRIlC2+ieXq+0sZv0WZ0eOkWt2 9QR33LOyJLDdofdabVLStuxcw3+6HUtMUNHB2lnRKUhIpoPMNPiImXhbR+gWaxsoy6Nb 4TekmbXSbe/WCBlBFlXHP0ovbrqWVPVA1Vu3izWKhMm0NO2BlN+Eugqh/syWaoNfi8XD Kx5Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.146.133 with SMTP id u127mr27107559vkd.42.1445903534183; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.40.132 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A324910C9@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A324910C9@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:52:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJwYUrGtJ8dOS5q-ofrxnFkCGRV0xgDb7ZQ=yvtPq+A-o7BNBA@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com>
To: "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143a86288deb205230aa62b"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/supa/Gs2-Y7thdfx308OPsB1D41FIeJg>
Cc: Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>, "supa@ietf.org" <supa@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94
X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Shared Unified Policy Automation\) related issues." <supa.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/supa/>
List-Post: <mailto:supa@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:52:17 -0000

Hi Dan and Nevil,

I'm confused. In the agenda, you wrote:

> 3.2 If the working group considers it necessary, a generic
> information model composed of policy concepts and
> vocabulary.
>
> - Problem Statement for Simplified Use of Policy
> Abstractions (SUPA) (20 minutes - 60/150)
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karagiannis-supa-
> problem-statement/

This draft says that an information model is required, but
does not describe what that information model is. Earlier,
I had requested a slot for presenting the revisions to
draft-strassner-supa-generic-policy-info-model-02,
which is missing from your list.

Could you kindly clarify if you would like me to present
the info model or not?

regards,
John

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:22 PM, King, Daniel <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
wrote:

> Hi Supa,
>
>
>
> Please find the updated agenda for our inaugural meeting in Yokohama:
>
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-supa
>
>
>
> As discussed, a significant portion of the meeting will be to focus on
> I-Ds that are directly relevant to achieving those goals. Currently, we
> identified these core I-Ds as:
>
>
>
> The Framework of Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhou-supa-framework/
>
>
>
> Problem Statement for Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karagiannis-supa-problem-statement/
>
>
>
> ECA Policy YANG Data Model
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-supa-eca-data-model/
>
>
>
> Applicability of SUPA
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vadrevu-supa-applicability/
>
>
>
> If you are an author of a document that you believe has been overlooked as
> a milestone deliverable, then please initiate discussion on the list or
> contact the Chairs.
>
>
>
> Other topics for our meeting include:
>
>
>
> - Impact on SUPA from other Specification and Standards development
> organisations?
>
> - Discussion on SUPA contributions to Open Source Controller projects?
>
> - Should we organise a Hackathon project for SUPA at IETF 95?
>
>
>
> Representatives or contributors from other SDOs, and/or Open Source
> projects, that would like agenda time to highlight relevant (SUPA-related)
> discussion and findings from their own activities are very welcome.
>
>
>
> BR, Dan & Nevil.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Supa mailing list
> Supa@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa
>
>


-- 
regards,
John