IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 30 October 2015 02:55 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639E21B3538 for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.054
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.054 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2RYjE7SKvkOf for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CAF01B3537 for <supa@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=101.110.53.38;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'King, Daniel'" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>, supa@ietf.org
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A324910C9@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
In-Reply-To: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A324910C9@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:55:36 -0400
Message-ID: <001001d112be$74cf1670$5e6d4350$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0011_01D1129C.EDC083B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQM3Pb9y/ZZ2Uovn6unhA9X2WLnoV5u2/NEA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/supa/jON__m0HtihiWeLV-W4502KMNOw>
Cc: 'Nevil Brownlee' <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94
X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Shared Unified Policy Automation\) related issues." <supa.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/supa/>
List-Post: <mailto:supa@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 02:55:44 -0000

Daniel and Nevil: 

 

After reading your agenda, I found a section of the SUPA agenda that states:


- Impact on SUPA from other Specification and Standards development
organisations?

 

Would it  be appropriate to provide an example of where the
draft-chen-eca-data-model-05 has an application?   The I2RS Filter-Based RIB
utilizes ECA policy or ACL policy.  I have draft on the ECA-policy for the
I2RS Filter-Based RIB (draft-hares-i2rs-bnp-eca-data-model).  

 

I can provide a comparison in a few slides.   

 

Sue Hares 

 

 

From: Supa [mailto:supa-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of King, Daniel
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 5:22 PM
To: supa@ietf.org
Cc: King, Daniel; Nevil Brownlee
Subject: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94

 

Hi Supa, 

 

Please find the updated agenda for our inaugural meeting in Yokohama:

 

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-supa

 

As discussed, a significant portion of the meeting will be to focus on I-Ds
that are directly relevant to achieving those goals. Currently, we
identified these core I-Ds as:

 

The Framework of Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhou-supa-framework/

 

Problem Statement for Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karagiannis-supa-problem-statement/

 

ECA Policy YANG Data Model

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-supa-eca-data-model/

 

Applicability of SUPA

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vadrevu-supa-applicability/

 

If you are an author of a document that you believe has been overlooked as a
milestone deliverable, then please initiate discussion on the list or
contact the Chairs. 

 

Other topics for our meeting include:

 

- Impact on SUPA from other Specification and Standards development
organisations?

- Discussion on SUPA contributions to Open Source Controller projects?

- Should we organise a Hackathon project for SUPA at IETF 95?

 

Representatives or contributors from other SDOs, and/or Open Source
projects, that would like agenda time to highlight relevant (SUPA-related)
discussion and findings from their own activities are very welcome. 

 

BR, Dan & Nevil.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email