Re: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94

Hi Dan,

wow, that was fast! Thanks for the clarification. I'll have slides to you
by Sunday, and hopefully a good chunk of the revised draft.

regards,
John

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:54 PM, King, Daniel <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
wrote:

> Hi John,
>
>
>
> It was a copy/paste error. The agenda was updated a few minutes ago (
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-supa). If you
> refresh it should show your I-D listed under:
>
>
>
> >>
>
> 3.2 If the working group considers it necessary, a generic information
> model composed of policy concepts and vocabulary.
>
>
>
> - Generic Policy Information Model for Simplified Use of Policy
> Abstractions (SUPA)
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-strassner-supa-generic-policy-info-model/
>
> <<
>
>
>
> Just to confirm. Yes. Please present the info model I-D.
>
>
>
> BR, Dan.
>
>
>
> *From:* John Strassner [mailto:strazpdj@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 26 October 2015 23:52
> *To:* King, Daniel <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
> *Cc:* supa@ietf.org; Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
> *Subject:* Re: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94
>
>
>
> Hi Dan and Nevil,
>
>
>
> I'm confused. In the agenda, you wrote:
>
>
>
> > 3.2 If the working group considers it necessary, a generic
>
> > information model composed of policy concepts and
>
> > vocabulary.
> >
> > - Problem Statement for Simplified Use of Policy
>
> > Abstractions (SUPA) (20 minutes - 60/150)
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karagiannis-supa-
>
> > problem-statement/
>
>
>
> This draft says that an information model is required, but
>
> does not describe what that information model is. Earlier,
>
> I had requested a slot for presenting the revisions to
>
> draft-strassner-supa-generic-policy-info-model-02,
>
> which is missing from your list.
>
>
>
> Could you kindly clarify if you would like me to present
>
> the info model or not?
>
>
>
> regards,
>
> John
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:22 PM, King, Daniel <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Supa,
>
>
>
> Please find the updated agenda for our inaugural meeting in Yokohama:
>
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-supa
>
>
>
> As discussed, a significant portion of the meeting will be to focus on
> I-Ds that are directly relevant to achieving those goals. Currently, we
> identified these core I-Ds as:
>
>
>
> The Framework of Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhou-supa-framework/
>
>
>
> Problem Statement for Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karagiannis-supa-problem-statement/
>
>
>
> ECA Policy YANG Data Model
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-supa-eca-data-model/
>
>
>
> Applicability of SUPA
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vadrevu-supa-applicability/
>
>
>
> If you are an author of a document that you believe has been overlooked as
> a milestone deliverable, then please initiate discussion on the list or
> contact the Chairs.
>
>
>
> Other topics for our meeting include:
>
>
>
> - Impact on SUPA from other Specification and Standards development
> organisations?
>
> - Discussion on SUPA contributions to Open Source Controller projects?
>
> - Should we organise a Hackathon project for SUPA at IETF 95?
>
>
>
> Representatives or contributors from other SDOs, and/or Open Source
> projects, that would like agenda time to highlight relevant (SUPA-related)
> discussion and findings from their own activities are very welcome.
>
>
>
> BR, Dan & Nevil.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Supa mailing list
> Supa@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> regards,
>
> John
>

-- 
regards,
John