IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94

"King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk> Fri, 30 October 2015 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31BA1A6F65 for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNzlPIJEUMLp for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ignavia.lancs.ac.uk (ignavia.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.25.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5661A1A98 for <supa@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ex-0-ht0.lancs.ac.uk ([10.42.18.47] helo=EX-0-HT0.lancs.local) by ignavia.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>) id 1ZsAwM-0008Qa-0h; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:46:02 +0000
Received: from EX-0-MB2.lancs.local ([fe80::9d98:936b:54d1:c531]) by EX-0-HT0.lancs.local ([fe80::7d10:114a:53b0:7f2f%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:46:01 +0000
From: "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "supa@ietf.org" <supa@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94
Thread-Index: AdEQMrgy6zazjsnYSgW50cEqc/0jgwCi7s4AABfuG1A=
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:46:00 +0000
Message-ID: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A32496EB0@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A324910C9@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local> <001001d112be$74cf1670$5e6d4350$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <001001d112be$74cf1670$5e6d4350$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [178.208.169.1]
x-iss-local-domain: 1
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A32496EB0EX0MB2lancsloca_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/supa/mYaV8fkSWuXWYoNQ_Gcz8GgD1Ng>
Cc: 'Nevil Brownlee' <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94
X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Shared Unified Policy Automation\) related issues." <supa.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/supa/>
List-Post: <mailto:supa@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:46:10 -0000

Hi Sue,

That sounds like a good idea. It will help continue the discussion on use cases.

Our preference is to the find the initial 1-2 "killer apps" for the SUPA policy model(s), rather than demonstrating an exhaustive set of potential use cases. Operators and Service Providers must continue to be vocal on how they intend to use the SUPA models.

BR, Dan.

From: Supa [mailto:supa-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 30 October 2015 02:56
To: King, Daniel <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>; supa@ietf.org
Cc: 'Nevil Brownlee' <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94

Daniel and Nevil:

After reading your agenda, I found a section of the SUPA agenda that states:
- Impact on SUPA from other Specification and Standards development organisations?

Would it  be appropriate to provide an example of where the draft-chen-eca-data-model-05 has an application?   The I2RS Filter-Based RIB utilizes ECA policy or ACL policy.  I have draft on the ECA-policy for the I2RS Filter-Based RIB (draft-hares-i2rs-bnp-eca-data-model).

I can provide a comparison in a few slides.

Sue Hares


From: Supa [mailto:supa-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of King, Daniel
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 5:22 PM
To: supa@ietf.org<mailto:supa@ietf.org>
Cc: King, Daniel; Nevil Brownlee
Subject: [Supa] Updated Agenda for IETF 94

Hi Supa,

Please find the updated agenda for our inaugural meeting in Yokohama:

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-supa

As discussed, a significant portion of the meeting will be to focus on I-Ds that are directly relevant to achieving those goals. Currently, we identified these core I-Ds as:

The Framework of Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhou-supa-framework/

Problem Statement for Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karagiannis-supa-problem-statement/

ECA Policy YANG Data Model
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-supa-eca-data-model/

Applicability of SUPA
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vadrevu-supa-applicability/

If you are an author of a document that you believe has been overlooked as a milestone deliverable, then please initiate discussion on the list or contact the Chairs.

Other topics for our meeting include:

- Impact on SUPA from other Specification and Standards development organisations?
- Discussion on SUPA contributions to Open Source Controller projects?
- Should we organise a Hackathon project for SUPA at IETF 95?

Representatives or contributors from other SDOs, and/or Open Source projects, that would like agenda time to highlight relevant (SUPA-related) discussion and findings from their own activities are very welcome.

BR, Dan & Nevil.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email