Re: [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation

[Rui Paulo <[e-mail]>]

On 11 Sep 2013, at 14:04, Fernando Gont <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi, Rui,
> 
> Thanks so much for the review! Please find my comments inline...
> 
> On 09/11/2013 02:08 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> * Section 3.4 says " (Failed) Simultaneous Connection Termination" in
>> the TCP time sequence ASCII
> 
> mm.. yes.. anything I'm missing?

It should say "Simultaneous Window Probes”.


>> * Section 4.1.  TCP sequence number validation -> text is repeated
> 
> Yes. I guess the question here is what style we should use to do the update.
> 
> In other documents I authored in the past, I was asked to quote the text
> to be replaced, and then the text it should be replaced with -- that's
> why you see "duplicate" text.
> 
> Two possible improvements are:
> 
> * Indent the quoted text (although the indentation will mean that the
> quoted text won't look the same as in RFC793, because the length of each
> line would increase as a result of indentation, and hence they'd have to
> be rewrapped), or,
> 
> * Try to quote only the specific sentences and tables to be replaced --
> although this would make the text/spec harder to read.

OK, I understand it now. How about underlining the differences somehow or putting “=>” marks next to the areas that changed?

--
Rui Paulo