IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation

Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Wed, 11 September 2013 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D3021F9D50 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OqcLzsDwYJ66 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (ns.sfc.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:8803:203:178:142:143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC3221F9D44 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F375278087 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 05:43:16 +0900 (JST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id w6so114344lbh.33 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=thiAf7HiC2PNteMDxYhqUkXOJgIawqfyRO3x5JIFH2M=; b=VS/ezS3ekg7WP8niZkvpPsyHlgp8kmATMmuMwxEn5IACAoS6c6luYvq4MUz8K37paY A/IwOtr9vW46/9SpyMsHsSTm46rRhXlzKJuc5sJCgfszAOKD+ewf0OtfL/iy+wsfzWjR UPeUmykx3vCLB/CA1cArLna6DjakdnWzY29wwN+QhoCce7NsLHZVivlsSchpiEbbLUHs 4YHG5vZMmuAoDmv7BOT9K0pL1nIXlw/q5nIflRexGf5aS7BMgbZ+W/QNe38b3u39TRNM OlsKUd7+Ugj41IcRBgdr/DianGzJaW8OWclRvJuj63GK2z8yNw+duFQUjhCbBASA0e0q iw6g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.8.115 with SMTP id q19mr2912293laa.16.1378932193478; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.1.115 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CFDFBEFD-5C52-4DD2-B87F-ED94A0495CFE@apple.com>
References: <CFDFBEFD-5C52-4DD2-B87F-ED94A0495CFE@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:43:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO249yeCQ83HdgoMXa4ojpg6wWN5ZMcNiS6+Rgw4KhOKEMEaaw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, David Borman <David.Borman@quantum.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:43:30 -0000

Hi Rui,

Thanks for the review.
I think Section 4.1 is the critical part of the draft. If there is
something we can improve this section for the next draft or if you see
some potential risks there, please let us know.

Regards,
--
Yoshifumi


On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been asked to review draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation. Below are my comments. In general the draft looks good. Section 4.1 is a bit hard to review given that the text is repeated. This is something we can review again in the next draft version.
>
> * "and thus elicits a ACK segment" -> "an ACK"
>
> * Section 3.4 says " (Failed) Simultaneous Connection Termination" in the TCP time sequence ASCII
>
> * Section 4.1.  TCP sequence number validation -> text is repeated
>
> * Section 7 doesn't look like an acknowledgement.
>
>
> --
> Rui Paulo
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email