Re: [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation
Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com> Wed, 11 September 2013 22:24 UTC
Return-Path: <rpaulo@apple.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B4921E8082 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yUVePcFEAE9G for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C3A11E80E7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from relay2.apple.com ([17.128.113.67]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MSZ00FUUFK124C0@mail-out.apple.com> for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807143-b7fce6d000001c8e-2d-5230ed8168fc
Received: from sesame.apple.com (sesame.apple.com [17.128.115.128]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay2.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id C4.4E.07310.18DE0325; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rui-macbook-pro.apple.com (rui-macbook-pro.apple.com [17.193.13.39]) by sesame.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0MSZ00IFZFK12500@sesame.apple.com> for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <CAO249yeCQ83HdgoMXa4ojpg6wWN5ZMcNiS6+Rgw4KhOKEMEaaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:22:30 -0700
Message-id: <0B354526-45F0-4DB9-8685-F2A23486B314@apple.com>
References: <CFDFBEFD-5C52-4DD2-B87F-ED94A0495CFE@apple.com> <CAO249yeCQ83HdgoMXa4ojpg6wWN5ZMcNiS6+Rgw4KhOKEMEaaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1809)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FDcoNv41iDIYMVmA4ttJ+czOTB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY9uNP+wF3cwV9y48Zm5gXMPUxcjJISFgInHx/ht2CFtM4sK9 9WxdjFwcQgJ9TBIL+j6wQjg7mCTuTprOAlLFLKAj0fv9GzOIzSugJ/G4cSpQEQeHsIC+xIlV CiBhNgEliWd9J8CGcgoESxz4uJ0VxGYRUJX4sHMyK8SYTYwSdxvkIWx5ic1r3kKNtJHY92Ev 1N5mRonl71eCXSoCtOvD949QV8tK7Ni/hGkCo8AsJCfNQnLSLCRzFzAyr2IUKErNSaw00kss KMhJ1UvOz93ECA69QucdjMeWWR1iFOBgVOLh7ZhlECTEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhLd9AlCINyWx siq1KD++qDQntfgQozQHi5I4b9k1oJRAemJJanZqakFqEUyWiYNTqoExMPxD//6vAcujXKba 60ulev86n/Ikcb7qjx9VIRfu8BeUKy+/2RT2/IH4/VKzT+8jKmfdPnZ3k9L7wNYp/ze4n+qb tuDORV3PO/Y3z2hvq6m8+LIssezc7zObdDlnJnjb1vHvKj67+XuSjCRT9u7mRV9abxjHaPeV b7GOijweqL241q5UI95XiaU4I9FQi7moOBEAWdfWyjkCAAA=
Cc: "tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, David Borman <David.Borman@quantum.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:24:33 -0000
On 11 Sep 2013, at 13:43, Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp> wrote: > Hi Rui, > > Thanks for the review. > I think Section 4.1 is the critical part of the draft. If there is > something we can improve this section for the next draft or if you see > some potential risks there, please let us know. The text looks good. The tables also look good to me. -- Rui Paulo
- [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation Rui Paulo
- Re: [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation Rui Paulo
- Re: [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation Rui Paulo
- Re: [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation Yoshifumi Nishida
- [tcpm] draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation Karen E. Egede Nielsen