Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09

Gregory Lebovitz <gregory.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 17 November 2009 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9CD3A6B0D for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:54:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0HP2zEPuqJS4 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:54:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223D63A68C2 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so210223fga.13 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:54:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dxytl2kPjmnMRAfx6nAKTRwNXjuVBYJtpbtwxcA7W1s=; b=Xk2T1+qEAIq8zeex9EqJrUpVxNPlr5YllSc7QYWXzK9SsIccw/ozqMOrhlI51AwT9M FcHnuBf2pW/kfoMqPTaGZJKoA1ULggzN1Oy8o6uMVY5ImosvObhp6gd9J8aMepIUPyNm gFGqTo/jINKndkJxg6jbVQqdlBEkivtuyr3KQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mEhcUCdsEiroSv/ZiPSK9W61oxb7+33e7zH3WSCHhn5rF9CAxEDoU9D9hIp0A0/eG0 rgyGevf80693OEEyzZ520TMDCMp7ck+o1+H1mSC9wNsgGXsoF2UNX8R4KmYqyX9qbSJS gZ1BkTZZ/9b1gIHk6Pv4GVYOHH0Ole1jRhFRE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.86.230.30 with SMTP id c30mr506384fgh.68.1258494849583; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:54:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47D7983828@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
References: <AcpnkXWbDjCee2T3TouQOFD+OSLnvQ==> <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47D7983828@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:54:09 -0800
Message-ID: <f1548840911171354w2072482xabacbcca2ee83ae@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Lebovitz <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001485e29a4c760a250478982aa1"
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:54:16 -0000

should we also list here the current draft on NAT-Traversal for TCP-AO? It's
not a WG item, but it is being done as a possible (likely?) textual addition
to a WG item. comment?

Gregory.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE
CORP] <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> wrote:

> Hello; since TCPM didn't meet in Hiroshima, but we do have
> several documents in the process of being finished up, and
> a couple others in the process of starting, here's a quick
> snapshot of the TCPM working group status and the actions
> needed on each document; please let us know if we left
> anything out:
>
>
> Active WG Items
> ===============
>
> TCP Authentication Option
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-08.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2009
> Action: In WGLC until 11/24/09
>
> TCP Authentication Option Crypto
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-01.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard with AO spec
> Action: In WGLC until 11/24/09
>
> ICMP Attacks
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-06.txt
> Milestone Target: Informational in July 2009
> Action: WGLC started 9/1, ended 9/15 ... Fernando Gont to update based on
> WGLC
>
> Early-Retransmit
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-02.txt
> Milestone Target: Experimental in July 2009
> Action: WGLC finished & authors updated (action with chairs to forward to
> IESG)
>
> 1323bis
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
> Action: Revise & WGLC (action with D. Borman)
>
> MSS Option
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-02.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
> Action: WGLC started 8/19, ended 9/8 (extended), being updated based on
> several
>        of the comments (action with D. Borman)
>
> Urgent Pointer
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-01.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in January 2010
> Action: Continue WG reviews; authors have indicated it is ready for WGLC;
>        planned to start WGLC after AO WGLC completes
>
> TCP Security
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-00.txt
> Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010
> Action: 00-draft / outline has been under active discussion; but not
> attained
>          very clear consensus
>        WG might begin working on recommendations while still looking for a
>          possible compromise on outline (action with Fernando Gont)
>
> Long Connectivity Disruptions
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zimmermann-tcp-lcd-02.txt
> (need to submit WG version)
> Milestone Target: Experimental in October 2010
> Action: need WG to read/discuss
>        authors to submit revision (action with Zimmerman)
>
> SACK Entry
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-00.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010
> Action: need WG to read/discuss
>        TBD how this relates to 3517
>
>
> Other Proposals
> ===============
>
> Persist
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-01.txt
> Action: WG Review
>
> Timestamps
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt
> Action: ???
>
> Parameter Tuning
> (no I-D yet)
> Action: continue good discussion on mailing list
>        presentation given in Stockholm
>
> TCP Option for Transparent Middlebox Discovery
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-knutsen-tcpm-middlebox-discovery-03.txt
> Action: Needs WG review / discussion
>        discussion on mailing list has been productive
>
> NewReno Modification
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-01.txt
> Action: need WG to read/discuss
>        presentation given, but WG list not yet polled for adoption
>
> Recent discussions opened on Rate-Halving
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathis-tcp-ratehalving-00.txt
> Action: mailing list discussion about the history of this, and whether
>        it needs to be revived
>
> --
> Wes Eddy
> MTI Systems
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>



-- 
----
IETF related email from
Gregory M. Lebovitz
Juniper Networks