Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09

draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat should definitely be on the list;
thanks for the reminder :).

So far, there have been a couple of people that said they'd
support this as part of AO, but not very many.  I haven't
seen anything indicating there are people against it yet
either ... it would be good to hear what more people think
about this as part of the AO WGLC that's in-progress.  If
there's reasonable support, it sounds like Joe is willing
to roll it into the AO draft after WGLC.

--
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gregory Lebovitz [mailto:gregory.ietf@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 4:54 PM
>To: Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]; Joe Touch
>Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09
>
>should we also list here the current draft on NAT-Traversal for TCP-AO?
>It's not a WG item, but it is being done as a possible (likely?) textual
>addition to a WG item. comment?
>
>Gregory.
>
>
>On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC
>AEROSPACE CORP] <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>
>	Hello; since TCPM didn't meet in Hiroshima, but we do have
>	several documents in the process of being finished up, and
>	a couple others in the process of starting, here's a quick
>	snapshot of the TCPM working group status and the actions
>	needed on each document; please let us know if we left
>	anything out:
>
>
>	Active WG Items
>	===============
>
>	TCP Authentication Option
>	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-08.txt
>	Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2009
>	Action: In WGLC until 11/24/09
>
>	TCP Authentication Option Crypto
>	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-01.txt
>	Milestone Target: Proposed Standard with AO spec
>	Action: In WGLC until 11/24/09
>
>	ICMP Attacks
>	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-06.txt
>	Milestone Target: Informational in July 2009
>	Action: WGLC started 9/1, ended 9/15 ... Fernando Gont to update
>based on WGLC
>
>	Early-Retransmit
>	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-02.txt
>	Milestone Target: Experimental in July 2009
>	Action: WGLC finished & authors updated (action with chairs to
>forward to IESG)
>
>	1323bis
>	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt
>	Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
>	Action: Revise & WGLC (action with D. Borman)
>
>	MSS Option
>	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-02.txt
>	Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
>	Action: WGLC started 8/19, ended 9/8 (extended), being updated
>based on several
>	       of the comments (action with D. Borman)
>
>	Urgent Pointer
>	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-01.txt
>	Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in January 2010
>	Action: Continue WG reviews; authors have indicated it is ready
>for WGLC;
>	       planned to start WGLC after AO WGLC completes
>
>	TCP Security
>	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-00.txt
>	Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010
>	Action: 00-draft / outline has been under active discussion; but
>not attained
>	         very clear consensus
>	       WG might begin working on recommendations while still
>looking for a
>	         possible compromise on outline (action with Fernando
>Gont)
>
>	Long Connectivity Disruptions
>	http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zimmermann-tcp-lcd-
>02.txt
>	(need to submit WG version)
>	Milestone Target: Experimental in October 2010
>	Action: need WG to read/discuss
>	       authors to submit revision (action with Zimmerman)
>
>	SACK Entry
>	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-00.txt
>	Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010
>	Action: need WG to read/discuss
>	       TBD how this relates to 3517
>
>
>	Other Proposals
>	===============
>
>	Persist
>	http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-01.txt
>	Action: WG Review
>
>	Timestamps
>	http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt
>	Action: ???
>
>	Parameter Tuning
>	(no I-D yet)
>	Action: continue good discussion on mailing list
>	       presentation given in Stockholm
>
>	TCP Option for Transparent Middlebox Discovery
>	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-knutsen-tcpm-middlebox-discovery-
>03.txt
>	Action: Needs WG review / discussion
>	       discussion on mailing list has been productive
>
>	NewReno Modification
>	http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-
>modification-01.txt
>	Action: need WG to read/discuss
>	       presentation given, but WG list not yet polled for adoption
>
>	Recent discussions opened on Rate-Halving
>	http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathis-tcp-ratehalving-00.txt
>	Action: mailing list discussion about the history of this, and
>whether
>	       it needs to be revived
>
>	--
>	Wes Eddy
>	MTI Systems
>
>	_______________________________________________
>	tcpm mailing list
>	tcpm@ietf.org
>	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>----
>IETF related email from
>Gregory M. Lebovitz
>Juniper Networks