Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09
Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Tue, 17 November 2009 22:17 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EC63A68FF for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:17:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHvf4aoQrpMQ for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21AC3A67D4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [75.217.224.142] (142.sub-75-217-224.myvzw.com [75.217.224.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by nitro.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAHMG82k022809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:16:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B0320A5.8040300@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:16:05 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gregory Lebovitz <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <AcpnkXWbDjCee2T3TouQOFD+OSLnvQ==> <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47D7983828@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <f1548840911171354w2072482xabacbcca2ee83ae@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f1548840911171354w2072482xabacbcca2ee83ae@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-ID: nAHMG82k022809
X-ISI-4-69-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:17:27 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Gregory, Gregory Lebovitz wrote: > should we also list here the current draft on NAT-Traversal for TCP-AO? > It's not a WG item, but it is being done as a possible (likely?) textual > addition to a WG item. comment? It might be useful. I know there are a few people who said they might post their thoughts on this shortly... (i.e., this is a reminder to them ;-) Joe > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC > AEROSPACE CORP] <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov <mailto:wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>> > wrote: > > Hello; since TCPM didn't meet in Hiroshima, but we do have > several documents in the process of being finished up, and > a couple others in the process of starting, here's a quick > snapshot of the TCPM working group status and the actions > needed on each document; please let us know if we left > anything out: > > > Active WG Items > =============== > > TCP Authentication Option > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-08.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2009 > Action: In WGLC until 11/24/09 > > TCP Authentication Option Crypto > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-01.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard with AO spec > Action: In WGLC until 11/24/09 > > ICMP Attacks > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-06.txt > Milestone Target: Informational in July 2009 > Action: WGLC started 9/1, ended 9/15 ... Fernando Gont to update > based on WGLC > > Early-Retransmit > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-02.txt > Milestone Target: Experimental in July 2009 > Action: WGLC finished & authors updated (action with chairs to > forward to IESG) > > 1323bis > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 > Action: Revise & WGLC (action with D. Borman) > > MSS Option > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-02.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 > Action: WGLC started 8/19, ended 9/8 (extended), being updated based > on several > of the comments (action with D. Borman) > > Urgent Pointer > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-01.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in January 2010 > Action: Continue WG reviews; authors have indicated it is ready for > WGLC; > planned to start WGLC after AO WGLC completes > > TCP Security > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-00.txt > Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010 > Action: 00-draft / outline has been under active discussion; but not > attained > very clear consensus > WG might begin working on recommendations while still looking > for a > possible compromise on outline (action with Fernando Gont) > > Long Connectivity Disruptions > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zimmermann-tcp-lcd-02.txt > (need to submit WG version) > Milestone Target: Experimental in October 2010 > Action: need WG to read/discuss > authors to submit revision (action with Zimmerman) > > SACK Entry > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-00.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010 > Action: need WG to read/discuss > TBD how this relates to 3517 > > > Other Proposals > =============== > > Persist > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-01.txt > Action: WG Review > > Timestamps > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt > Action: ??? > > Parameter Tuning > (no I-D yet) > Action: continue good discussion on mailing list > presentation given in Stockholm > > TCP Option for Transparent Middlebox Discovery > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-knutsen-tcpm-middlebox-discovery-03.txt > Action: Needs WG review / discussion > discussion on mailing list has been productive > > NewReno Modification > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-01.txt > Action: need WG to read/discuss > presentation given, but WG list not yet polled for adoption > > Recent discussions opened on Rate-Halving > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathis-tcp-ratehalving-00.txt > Action: mailing list discussion about the history of this, and whether > it needs to be revived > > -- > Wes Eddy > MTI Systems > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm > > > > > -- > ---- > IETF related email from > Gregory M. Lebovitz > Juniper Networks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAksDIKUACgkQE5f5cImnZrsbAQCg1fVGyGXqgLo3Of1BxRpC4dfB +/UAnirM1ZJU1iNZ2GwrsptenzoNswV7 =NYcT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Gregory Lebovitz
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09 Jerry Chu