Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Tue, 17 November 2009 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EC63A68FF for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:17:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHvf4aoQrpMQ for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21AC3A67D4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [75.217.224.142] (142.sub-75-217-224.myvzw.com [75.217.224.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by nitro.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAHMG82k022809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:16:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B0320A5.8040300@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:16:05 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gregory Lebovitz <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <AcpnkXWbDjCee2T3TouQOFD+OSLnvQ==> <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47D7983828@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <f1548840911171354w2072482xabacbcca2ee83ae@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f1548840911171354w2072482xabacbcca2ee83ae@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-ID: nAHMG82k022809
X-ISI-4-69-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] working group status 11/17/09
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:17:27 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, Gregory,

Gregory Lebovitz wrote:
> should we also list here the current draft on NAT-Traversal for TCP-AO?
> It's not a WG item, but it is being done as a possible (likely?) textual
> addition to a WG item. comment?

It might be useful. I know there are a few people who said they might
post their thoughts on this shortly... (i.e., this is a reminder to them ;-)

Joe


> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC
> AEROSPACE CORP] <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov <mailto:wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>>
> wrote:
> 
>     Hello; since TCPM didn't meet in Hiroshima, but we do have
>     several documents in the process of being finished up, and
>     a couple others in the process of starting, here's a quick
>     snapshot of the TCPM working group status and the actions
>     needed on each document; please let us know if we left
>     anything out:
> 
> 
>     Active WG Items
>     ===============
> 
>     TCP Authentication Option
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-08.txt
>     Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2009
>     Action: In WGLC until 11/24/09
> 
>     TCP Authentication Option Crypto
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-01.txt
>     Milestone Target: Proposed Standard with AO spec
>     Action: In WGLC until 11/24/09
> 
>     ICMP Attacks
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-06.txt
>     Milestone Target: Informational in July 2009
>     Action: WGLC started 9/1, ended 9/15 ... Fernando Gont to update
>     based on WGLC
> 
>     Early-Retransmit
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-02.txt
>     Milestone Target: Experimental in July 2009
>     Action: WGLC finished & authors updated (action with chairs to
>     forward to IESG)
> 
>     1323bis
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt
>     Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
>     Action: Revise & WGLC (action with D. Borman)
> 
>     MSS Option
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-02.txt
>     Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
>     Action: WGLC started 8/19, ended 9/8 (extended), being updated based
>     on several
>            of the comments (action with D. Borman)
> 
>     Urgent Pointer
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-01.txt
>     Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in January 2010
>     Action: Continue WG reviews; authors have indicated it is ready for
>     WGLC;
>            planned to start WGLC after AO WGLC completes
> 
>     TCP Security
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-00.txt
>     Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010
>     Action: 00-draft / outline has been under active discussion; but not
>     attained
>              very clear consensus
>            WG might begin working on recommendations while still looking
>     for a
>              possible compromise on outline (action with Fernando Gont)
> 
>     Long Connectivity Disruptions
>     http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zimmermann-tcp-lcd-02.txt
>     (need to submit WG version)
>     Milestone Target: Experimental in October 2010
>     Action: need WG to read/discuss
>            authors to submit revision (action with Zimmerman)
> 
>     SACK Entry
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-00.txt
>     Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010
>     Action: need WG to read/discuss
>            TBD how this relates to 3517
> 
> 
>     Other Proposals
>     ===============
> 
>     Persist
>     http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-01.txt
>     Action: WG Review
> 
>     Timestamps
>     http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt
>     Action: ???
> 
>     Parameter Tuning
>     (no I-D yet)
>     Action: continue good discussion on mailing list
>            presentation given in Stockholm
> 
>     TCP Option for Transparent Middlebox Discovery
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-knutsen-tcpm-middlebox-discovery-03.txt
>     Action: Needs WG review / discussion
>            discussion on mailing list has been productive
> 
>     NewReno Modification
>     http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-01.txt
>     Action: need WG to read/discuss
>            presentation given, but WG list not yet polled for adoption
> 
>     Recent discussions opened on Rate-Halving
>     http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathis-tcp-ratehalving-00.txt
>     Action: mailing list discussion about the history of this, and whether
>            it needs to be revived
> 
>     --
>     Wes Eddy
>     MTI Systems
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     tcpm mailing list
>     tcpm@ietf.org <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ----
> IETF related email from
> Gregory M. Lebovitz
> Juniper Networks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAksDIKUACgkQE5f5cImnZrsbAQCg1fVGyGXqgLo3Of1BxRpC4dfB
+/UAnirM1ZJU1iNZ2GwrsptenzoNswV7
=NYcT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----