Re: [tcpm] intended status of UTO

[David Borman <[e-mail]>]

Ok, I'll clarify it.  The UTO document went through WGLC without  
changing it to experimental, so it is standards track.  Wes' message  
explicitly brought up this point, so that people could object if they  
felt that wasn't true.  So far, no one has objected, so it is still  
standards track.  As Magnus notes, any late-comers that want to object  
will now have to do this during the IETF last call.

			-David Borman, TCPM WG co-chair

On Nov 5, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:

> Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] skrev:
>> Although UTO has finished last-call and been submitted
>> for publication, Magnus has noted that there seemed to
>> be a question during last call about its intended status
>> that wasn't conclusively resolved.
>>
>> Our ADs would like to make sure that there isn't going
>> to be a problem with publishing this as proposed standard,
>> and need the WG's feedback in order to advance the document.
>>
>> By my homework, the charter item for UTO was written for
>> a proposed standard.  When I checked the archives, it
>> looked like Pasi was the only WGLC commenter that argued
>> for experimental, and on the other hand, Joe, Mark,
>> Caitlin, and Toby all seemed to support it as proposed
>> standard.  Versions 04 through 09 of the draft include
>> "Intended status: Standards Track".
>>
>> However, in the IETF 68 minutes, I found this:
>> * Lars and chairs did not remember if this is going for experimental
>> or
>>   proposed. Tim Shepard has preference for experimental.
>>   - Tim Shepherd: in San Diego asked this explicitly from chairs
>> during
>>     agenda bashing, they said the plan is for Experimental.
>>   - Lars: ok
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I had hoped the WG chairs would simply declare that standards track  
> was
> the consensus of the WG last call. To me it is quite clear that this  
> is
> the case. The old IETF 68 minutes are far prior to the WG last call.
> Thus I will declare that UTO will be IETF last called intended for
> Standards Track. If anyone object about this they can send in a IETF
> last call comment on this.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone [phone]
> Färögatan 6                | Fax   [phone]
> S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [e-mail]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm