IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tlp-interest] A clerical correction to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions 5.0

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 25 August 2021 07:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930FD3A11C2 for <tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jjwA-b7wnMNc for <tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E02A33A11B9 for <tlp-interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:fc1e:b128:7311:dd1e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 785D8600354; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:31:38 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1629876698; bh=Y7skFwPeN4YHbqbtU9g7SNTBjLpVjUbxMVam0CjiABY=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=mfAAnToh7flW0JcUvOmYUYWlVEXr6pHu0gzsYm/yzNg2Dk/pZVICaMJJwFUV+LULE mtAaGgPSl+M5OeP4jF35HNFBl52W8Q/0CC8LkuV/G5mrhyxTM+ikvYdaD/j+0GRHVV bcc91BoXg6duSkjbD/BVE1jCPKT3T1ObllUPAjag=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <6C522D16-813B-4E47-88C2-E41BFA5E0FAC@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_770D0879-24D9-47F6-BC1D-59C52377607C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:31:34 +0300
In-Reply-To: <99113e8f-993e-9de7-51d2-cdd128c09850@gmail.com>
Cc: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>, tlp-interest@ietf.org
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <cab44b30-90fe-7abf-1bb4-12ce844f41aa@taugh.com> <6F54A77A-963F-482A-BB21-A9FFF3167FB1@eggert.org> <505fda7-6f4-3497-bb6d-4f1efe491c49@iecc.com> <6a1638c3-3371-7249-1a9-b3b18ec41f7@iecc.com> <99113e8f-993e-9de7-51d2-cdd128c09850@gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 785D8600354.A2140
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tlp-interest/Xp6_YXz045AQpuvMzq1Ol4AePVM>
Subject: Re: [tlp-interest] A clerical correction to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions 5.0
X-BeenThere: tlp-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of proposed revisions to the Trust Legal Provisions <tlp-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tlp-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:tlp-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:31:55 -0000

On 2021-8-25, at 0:19, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> (b) I strongly suggest adding a note something like
> 
> "Between <date1> and <date2> this document erroneously referred to the Revised license as the 'Simplified' license, but the text of the license was always as intended."

+1

We might also want to add something about some/most RFCs between 5245-9118 (but please verify these numbers) having incorrect boilerplate text.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email