IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 29 March 2023 02:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C94C137392 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zySdWcBr3I_v for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 244FCC152564 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 32T2IeBs006261 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 03:22:43 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=DQBT3JCJ8FeETvHXqMN6jtvY4xmjIxNRd8C72p9KeYE=; b=J81dltyNoQfTOOfl+PtyrmSTGw/SD+lCo4X+WaLkAlgiYI/LoZ0dEB1p/O6GgzHNOM0a Hph2q70nnxOLLnFwdSow6b2vJhRgwzmlL3nppb/nvkjEZsi5NB6MMo6pfYHFXkrOU0K2 WF3hEKXvm8Qs9MgaWuttcwErAHLl2dvuzIzDgMZ4WWApSv4gLw2dPcpZ8n6dyu1f8sz4 7C4JbwUr9TdzhVrlEwepCFsbiEoHV3PuB/fQKg9VhWx49j0a8ZXVIBvUFi0sLjqOWVvr W7K3kPT6YDrEbMHKlY/98CDYk3OY7Od498N/FLPXz/VETdXTVBM18/GbEoCUr5Zlgwfz Vg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a72-247-45-31.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.31] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3phsvtfdck-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <TLS@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 03:22:43 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 32SM4mLb019842 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 22:22:42 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.205]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pjdv0tcmy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <TLS@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 22:22:42 -0400
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.21; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:22:42 -0700
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.1118.021; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:22:42 -0700
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "TLS@ietf.org" <TLS@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design
Thread-Index: AQHZYeDFjNIJr5uZc0O8Vbx7q5QSS68SEyOA
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 02:22:42 +0000
Message-ID: <26040140-DF3E-43CB-AC43-6E82EBE98941@akamai.com>
References: <FBE87FDA-A407-4DC8-A2E8-F39AB475C87B@heapingbits.net>
In-Reply-To: <FBE87FDA-A407-4DC8-A2E8-F39AB475C87B@heapingbits.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.71.23031800
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <3858154019C2BA4F82244A9C05F4FD8A@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-03-24_11,2023-03-28_02,2023-02-09_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=300 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303200000 definitions=main-2303290017
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: hLjfiYk_f-R5uM6OqRRlKb5hNlgA5dEq
X-Proofpoint-GUID: hLjfiYk_f-R5uM6OqRRlKb5hNlgA5dEq
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-03-24_11,2023-03-28_02,2023-02-09_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=1 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=229 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=1 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=1 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303200000 definitions=main-2303290017
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/3SYmVXJ39pHVQ1HfvxaZMeFsZ8I>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 02:22:50 -0000

> The intent of this proposal is to get us a codepoint that we can deploy today without putting a "draft codepoint" in an eventual RFC.

I support the proposal

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email