IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

Kris Kwiatkowski <kris@amongbytes.com> Fri, 19 May 2023 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <kris@amongbytes.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F550C151082 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 May 2023 15:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XubdOmSLpOsO for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 May 2023 15:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 2.mo580.mail-out.ovh.net (2.mo580.mail-out.ovh.net [178.33.255.145]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01D06C14CE31 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 May 2023 15:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxplan8.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.109.138.32]) by mo580.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23501FFE6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 May 2023 22:31:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from amongbytes.com (37.59.142.109) by mxplan8.mail.ovh.net (172.16.2.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.23; Sat, 20 May 2023 00:30:59 +0200
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-109S0034e6c36ef-afe7-4ca8-accc-c8c00d598d22, 70DCB61F9FC5FDFEBD4F71CD8D4C8E9532398C18) smtp.auth=kris@amongbytes.com
X-OVh-ClientIp: 62.30.61.232
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------nG6BATM6W6oenIE2wzXicj4k"
Message-ID: <c8e47fda-27b6-ab8b-f172-8ad4358003ea@amongbytes.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 23:30:51 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.1
To: tls@ietf.org
References: <64C8E9BD-C183-4998-9A2A-F6B6EF0C9562@akamai.com> <2D86B93D-9694-4AF3-A5C8-F00477EAC0F0@heapingbits.net> <cfe445c5-14f6-0dbe-9b4c-e68c479a1e40@amongbytes.com> <ZGfZk/g2Mk5duloh@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald>
From: Kris Kwiatkowski <kris@amongbytes.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZGfZk/g2Mk5duloh@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald>
X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: ad712883-ef4e-4528-89b6-c340a83bb83c
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 17916445219230301975
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfeeiiedgudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucenucfjughrpegtkfffgggfuffvfhfhjgesrgdtreertdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfhrihhsucfmfihirghtkhhofihskhhiuceokhhrihhssegrmhhonhhgsgihthgvshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdejvdefueelhfeltdegudejleetjeekueetuddtffeuhfefvefffeefvdevheffnecukfhppedtrddtrddtrddtpdeivddrfedtrdeiuddrvdefvddpfeejrdehledrudegvddruddtleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhhvghlohepmhigphhlrghnkedrmhgrihhlrdhovhhhrdhnvghtpdhinhgvtheptddrtddrtddrtddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehkrhhishesrghmohhnghgshihtvghsrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepthhlshesihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdfovfetjfhoshhtpehmohehkedt
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ORdma8j0HguQdjj0V0fKD1rwFtI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 22:31:09 -0000

> However, the difference is stated to be UncompressedPointRepresentation
> for P256 from TLS 1.3. AFACIT, that is 65 bytes (1 legacy_form byte,
> 32 bytes for x, 32 bytes for y).
Right, one byte for the legacy_form is missing. Let me fix it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email