Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 29 March 2023 02:21 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6617C152574 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.893
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id teH-M2tPmdmn for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0513C152564 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id r29so14088882wra.13 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1680056483; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RohrH0cTG+17xBdma6YMUhHvtYj5ju3lUYXk+P4vE+w=; b=52sNEF0jxkwYNMQGApKpJmcfJ5/8OLtd3mOn6tDCCb+sr23OVaQPo7ziN5hcqeoMSm ClI0s2HqV/B6Ez4QvXYT4HrV4oeks3QVumXiORHGaMMMqqL0zHGhtsh+94mA3WTFlfPs Pg8z0TbmRP1aCmX2JMZ1aHad2G/9VSsJdAxksWyxjdQXek7g1hgJvLWEg8rZEcvoFYPW dlo0kPvvtVNqitBnc7wiaVw+/zrAQkqjulnFOkhOUIF8CrckH3bxK12oCxuF+oifFq9A 59iKRo9piVb1j8WgScsxSeYbL4XOyDf/98xLXtfpm0zt72brZCyko2CC7HNXUfILg5yh 2lfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680056483; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=RohrH0cTG+17xBdma6YMUhHvtYj5ju3lUYXk+P4vE+w=; b=WyazRSOH/VVH4xXvpOsnRVNh1JIIP/0jqFa1dKoaLbfFDdtuhec1K3j4fBakNoHI5G xYo8Sh2e/2Qp0Y1i4i8JRKSx6ncjUZepz19FmBIo6kSVsnjGNig/mqoOWNWANNaaiMQp Z5IdH/yJ2fxVFtqnPLuf4Ud7ykCNdot2BGjauYCBhuifurt4sv/kyitnIepWL3+RS1tu xvkgfXCl4cLXjJipvf1zSlv1NuXalqN3lsIIK9QBP3BUAoE/easvUi07SKNmVa9PTQL6 KeaAG1N34hArPjNw5aI/JeoOXaAYpbTU/h85hziCQ03eULXdN0k2A0LFiyp3pIsmeUZv vHow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fnQMzgjbBwlPHoM7VMJTcDl/OHj94iXPgoHdvWvG/R+l1vsOs4 aVPyYUscKiJgfnfiSpCqwMgTmstNhYJ6/cb3gt/5Bblco4oG7dsYDWyVIQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350aC9K0ecE/2STY4k4PGug0tTJkaLtSvBV+EwoPzlhUzyKOV+Jld8iXx7NiTWCaffWIfm+OGakM9zxCu969wHa0=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e60e:0:b0:2cf:e44a:54a3 with SMTP id p14-20020adfe60e000000b002cfe44a54a3mr3659366wrm.5.1680056482803; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <FBE87FDA-A407-4DC8-A2E8-F39AB475C87B@heapingbits.net> <CAG2Zi21XT624yN2wjqMmKnyJSMdg8jv3u2oQ5U78+oW2uVgwKQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG2Zi21XT624yN2wjqMmKnyJSMdg8jv3u2oQ5U78+oW2uVgwKQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 22:21:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQyVpygXi2xLAYjEKw+zs1BzN33kyqF10YmKXmAuGU=XA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Patton <cpatton=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>, "TLS@ietf.org" <TLS@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dc44ec05f800a193"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/wrQbgM1qCMEPRqr_ctbLaz25eZ4>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 02:21:25 -0000
+1 On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:15 PM Christopher Patton <cpatton= 40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > I support this. Adding P256 + Kyber768 seems like a good idea. > > Chris P. > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 10:50 AM Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> > wrote: > >> As discussed during yesterday's meeting, we would like to assess >> consensus for moving draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design forward with the >> following strategy for allocating codepoints we can use in deployments. >> >> 1. Remove codepoints from draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design and advance this >> document through the process towards publication. >> 2. Write a simple -00 draft that specifies the target variant of >> X25519+Kyber768 with a codepoint from the standard ranges. (Bas helpfully >> did this for us already [1].) Once this is complete, request a codepoint >> from IANA using the standard procedure. >> >> The intent of this proposal is to get us a codepoint that we can deploy >> today without putting a "draft codepoint" in an eventual RFC. >> >> Please let us know if you support this proposal by April 18, 2023. >> Assuming there is rough consensus, we will move forward with this proposal. >> >> Best, >> Chris, Joe, and Sean >> >> [1] >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tls-westerbaan-xyber768d00-00 >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
- [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy for dr… Christopher Wood
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Krzysztof Kwiatkowski
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Christopher Patton
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Richard Barnes
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Kampanakis, Panos
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Kampanakis, Panos
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Loganaden Velvindron
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Bas Westerbaan
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Bas Westerbaan
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Kampanakis, Panos
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Krzysztof Kwiatkowski
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Krzysztof Kwiatkowski
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Christopher Wood
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Bas Westerbaan
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Kampanakis, Panos
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… John Mattsson
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Bas Westerbaan
- Re: [TLS] [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Consensus call … Kampanakis, Panos
- Re: [TLS] [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Consensus call … Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Consensus call … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Krzysztof Kwiatkowski
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Krzysztof Kwiatkowski
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Christopher Wood
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Kris Kwiatkowski
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on codepoint strategy fo… Kris Kwiatkowski