Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests

Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com> Sun, 17 November 2019 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bkaduk@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A8912003E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:00:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X9BDwWTAuxOX for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:00:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A58E120808 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:00:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xAH001or013808 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 00:00:01 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=date : from : to : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=jan2016.eng; bh=EnpXR1rm0c4/4M1ck88aD+LLz008ajHLl0SozvY+DQc=; b=jj07LGXMqIiVqfbjQnzOhtSJ0O0Gl66+QLH+odpgTCuVf/3juPBCLaMvxBxAxQj0l94M kjuuJFJcfK+224WXYZV1PehBs220xn8kHXIu7N7Z+MMd+IgRh+LiUsA1QqjoiAbN0Fdz mc/o1iqA5aKkqrS0XGlWE6dHPooDrVKK0XwSH6pxXFlOjWV59iExGsxf6WMA0iPBx+bV nLCLK/PWic0aPaWtpNSKel7RhFb1dB1gsAz2HKw2shNo56s1FMLcnYGTZ4VgORO6YIow mQ/fAAWU4zjrqTCXb20eXxk0jzBFBKfVq/s9JmKCwckJExi+QnrXeINvLUgZH1ewfBsF ig==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2wafqy26kn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAGNl2qe010988 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 18:59:55 -0500
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com ([172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2wadaxgv64-1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 18:59:54 -0500
Received: from bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com (bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.19.17.86]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70541FC95 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 23:59:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bkaduk by bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com with local (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <bkaduk@akamai.com>) id 1iW7yr-0006rn-MG for tls@ietf.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 15:59:53 -0800
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 15:59:53 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20191116235952.GR20609@akamai.com>
References: <2FB1D8AD-2C22-4A09-B7AF-0EFD6F0DBACA@sn3rd.com> <0469b84c-3009-427a-99ca-e7f6817f0b6c@www.fastmail.com> <caa6f6b4-537c-46bb-a04b-28d2b59f8ecd@www.fastmail.com> <20191116100546.GP34850@straasha.imrryr.org> <20191116103855.GQ20609@akamai.com> <20191116110425.GR34850@straasha.imrryr.org> <556d2210-4af7-b398-fbd7-eab2685d7c62@wizmail.org> <20191116210617.GS34850@straasha.imrryr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191116210617.GS34850@straasha.imrryr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-16_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=13 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=587 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1911160224
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-11-16_08:2019-11-15,2019-11-16 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=593 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=13 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1911160225
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/9CpOhticbNiupxDIorqbEG8lyKE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 00:00:03 -0000

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 04:06:17PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 04:38:17PM +0000, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> 
> > > Do you have an alternative suggestion?
> > 
> > The obvious encoding to me would be to reserve the all-bits-set value
> > to mean "client wants no tickets", all-bits-clear to mean "client
> > prefers to reuse tickets", anything else meaning "please serve up
> > to this many fresh tickets".
> 
> That also works, effectively treat 0xff as "-1", but all other
> values as non-negative, with 0 a request for re-use.  An isomorphic
> encoding, but without the "-1".

[Jeremy had a more eloquent description of the vague sketch of an idea that I had in my head]

-Ben