IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Sun, 02 February 2020 03:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074931200FD for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 19:58:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nvw3CPatBKkE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 19:58:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30924120020 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 19:58:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 94746386FD; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 22:58:48 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 22:58:48 -0500
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200202035848.GJ49778@straasha.imrryr.org>
Reply-To: tls@ietf.org
References: <9e4ada20-680e-6fa7-f8bb-e94c26440d82@cs.tcd.ie> <9A5EE7C8-360D-49C0-92F8-274FE1A94249@apple.com> <20200202013016.GH49778@straasha.imrryr.org> <CACsn0cnaUZHqo8L_qjvqE2bt-JU28QqG7S8m4xMwdK5CXyDHzw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0cnaUZHqo8L_qjvqE2bt-JU28QqG7S8m4xMwdK5CXyDHzw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/lb76R2YAGFcUP0ZKgh1I1WnX2Ic>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 03:58:53 -0000

On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:04:53PM -0800, Watson Ladd wrote:

> > The benefit of the new value of "0" is *unambiguous* signalling that the
> > client would like to reuse the ticket if possible, and the new "255"
> > then carries the "We don't need no stinking tickets" signal.
> >
> 
> I'd be happier with a magic 0, or a N = valid tickets at the end
> including the one used, then swapping 2 values and making one magic.
> (For those of you who aren't bridge fiends:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_sticker)

Sorry, no idea what that above means.  And is it simpler than the
proposal under discussion (which got some fine-tuning in early
feedback)?

-- 
    Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email