Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Tue, 21 January 2020 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3307E120808 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:47:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zTJW13acdJUX for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:47:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B95120170 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:47:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8C478494FD; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:47:22 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:47:22 -0500
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200121174722.GO73491@straasha.imrryr.org>
Reply-To: tls@ietf.org
References: <CADZyTkmaUVj=sFdgg93MuM2au0B=1M1k3yCA1XDoaAneVDmnNw@mail.gmail.com> <14690874-E301-4BC0-B385-00DEBCBA94C2@apple.com> <20191120034812.GQ34850@straasha.imrryr.org> <5FBFE820-8C53-4B32-9520-343279C1A6CC@apple.com> <20191120064819.GR34850@straasha.imrryr.org> <CAPDSy+6DFJ+OYRtYK6eEiUt1noiik4KxqrGFx0ro_RL2Mft_VA@mail.gmail.com> <fd37bd2a-c799-4bf4-95b3-65943681683b@www.fastmail.com> <20200121055411.GJ73491@straasha.imrryr.org> <97de6364-c628-45aa-8613-ba1a32cc41b2@www.fastmail.com> <A5448AC9-6EBB-48F9-A1B0-A787FBBCFF05@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A5448AC9-6EBB-48F9-A1B0-A787FBBCFF05@akamai.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/XsVvNgxCOxGg_Nn6riPbpxWDLeM>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:47:24 -0000

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 03:24:50PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:

> >    This is clearly a subjective call, so I'll step back now.
> 
> Yes it is.  But I will say that I agree with you and think the
> cleverness introduced by the "255 is magic" proposal is not warranted.

Really? TLS has no sentinel code ponts? No SCSVs?

This is not a substantive objection.

-- 
    Viktor.