Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sun, 02 February 2020 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F250A1200B1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 10:58:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iY47BLjzR_7u for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 10:58:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB7B1120115 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 10:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id o15so6748784ljg.6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 10:58:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0dI1eFKFLUl5Q2uRZ/691/A+NwVSZZpUNDJSqd36hvg=; b=jjE6TZ4F6xG19wNcHbChOmj5/ZfQj7ZSAeNASCuWJoJEDKMEGxvMZ5T5032be6OnP2 34zDEX8rpX9WHal31QJLIf8TkiO2AVuFMdhLR/vJCKbcUHzIaenGXte+jQrsEL/CkIap uAV9CFuewkEtLvDFedoypqYl2gyQfeaER4JR+qo01PHR76+rJRJ8dh0l10ekdLwzGtMc pEIo+RJu+A8CAYrSCZkZihmDHIJcAK7wSq7frxpqsjA+hHIpcxt7Dljht66i8Kmffesi rWp3uA5ibedUNU+26/XUrhBsxhXRFjIySgHndgx079wwDw9O0IZ+2sGrPFCZSWNxT6ct GtbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0dI1eFKFLUl5Q2uRZ/691/A+NwVSZZpUNDJSqd36hvg=; b=PkfkE2NtkpsC1pbGtcjETfQ6poK5ppukHb0bHe5Q7qfGPc2yqV/AdIFjbo/GFv2Qm1 W7EQPUGCywZmQ/RBljM+IsoQ7THgonftJm3cEUrbhDPL1usjGuH5vRA6b0Ko2/Q++/YF MvKzLVscWaHmjJZwjYuw4IHyUDbMjUWdzQIJXiue2fBKThWcHj2QvjGyWAbRWydDLm4g HjkZIkQqYZrsRGGqZMTd1pW759V/zJJ+mYYIWn4MflSyUVeF/HEOe7BfcgLae3eZPZUC l7TM6S382XMPT0CypuCNOMnnqLNK9jIg5R9+JvSuoVB3fRabQIILVBDkRXcK9YZd6e6Y WdjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvAmI0n+3sp1thvAxKkwXJHkqey52aQP79s5S3Rrg6F7gaKG/o rJPBJhahbx+HqAmND10gyJbVoO/aUdtxXBltTOXiSOzs
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwT69iqCoVob7ywuec5N72gNuLh7zqffxh0UQzyYOV4HsV5vtdwTexRIIJNLuik/0Ln8b4BhWqxi+hv+7yDSDg=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8797:: with SMTP id n23mr11043410lji.176.1580669912712; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 10:58:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200202115203.GK49778@straasha.imrryr.org> <1DEFB79F-802A-452C-8AE3-41336AC58F25@apple.com> <20200202175309.GL49778@straasha.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200202175309.GL49778@straasha.imrryr.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 10:57:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMm6giBwPEUw-Jgx6XXm+QWAY+V1KUx-JuZ8gVJMjAjrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a79b57059d9c64e2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/iTGXozNOPovJJNfwbclHoMZS4fs>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 18:58:37 -0000

On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 9:53 AM Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
wrote:

> Yes, that's because reuse does not need multiple tickets.  Indeed long
> ago upthread we discussed the fact that multiple tickets should
> generally only happen on full handshakes (or at least infrequently,
> rather than on each resumption).  Successful resumption should typically
> yield at most 1 ticket, otherwise the number of tickets indefinitely
> outpaces the number of connections.
>

"Generally" seems to be doing a fair bit of work here, as if you are doing
happy eyeballs or some other parallel connection mechanism, then you in
fact need N new tickets.

-Ekr


-Ekr