Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only AEAD ciphers
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 27 March 2014 06:33 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD21A1A029E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.13 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZcTCfDzjlcqa for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [209.135.209.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4771A0295 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D8F9A43D6; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:32:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X+dLNf5Agfmv; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.59.80.125] (unknown [210.229.158.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EBC9A43CA; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <86E69268-DC0A-43E7-8CF5-0DAE39FD4FD5@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:32:27 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3EAC453F-7902-48FC-B255-4416F50BBF82@vigilsec.com>
References: <86E69268-DC0A-43E7-8CF5-0DAE39FD4FD5@cisco.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <jsalowey@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KrVLuHdGUgHYafiBIsPNc4ygwrU
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only AEAD ciphers
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 06:33:10 -0000
I'd like to ask a clarifying question. Please look at RFC 6476. In that document, Peter Gutmann uses traditional encryption and integrity functions to make an AEAD cipher. Does this decision allow or prohibit such ciphers? Russ On Mar 26, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote: > TLS has supported a number of different cipher types for protecting the record layer. In TLS 1.3 these include Stream Cipher, CBC Block Cipher and AEAD Cipher. The construction of the CBC mode within TLS has been shown to be flawed and stream ciphers are not generally applicable to DTLS. Using a single mechanism for cryptographic transforms would make security analysis easier. AEAD ciphers can be constructed from stream ciphers and block ciphers and are defined as protocol independent transforms. The consensus in the room at IETF-89 was to only support AEAD ciphers in TLS 1.3. If you have concerns about this decision please respond on the TLS list by April 11, 2014. > > Thanks, > > Joe > [Speaking for the TLS chairs] >
- [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only AEA… Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Russ Housley
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Fedor Brunner
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Peter Bowen
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Ralph Holz
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Michael StJohns
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Michael StJohns
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Fedor Brunner
- [TLS] (offline note) Re: Confirming Consensus on … Rene Struik
- Re: [TLS] (offline note) Re: Confirming Consensus… Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Michael StJohns
- Re: [TLS] (offline note) Re: Confirming Consensus… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] (offline note) Re: Confirming Consensus… Michael StJohns
- Re: [TLS] (offline note) Re: Confirming Consensus… Michael StJohns
- Re: [TLS] (offline note) Re: Confirming Consensus… Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] (offline note) Re: Confirming Consensus… Michael StJohns
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus on supporting only… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] [PATCH] Clean up removal of all non-AEA… Martin Thomson
- [TLS] [PATCH] Clean up removal of all non-AEAD mo… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] [PATCH] Clean up removal of all non-AEA… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] [PATCH] Clean up removal of all non-AEA… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] [PATCH] Clean up removal of all non-AEA… Eric Rescorla