Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted

nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com> Tue, 13 March 2018 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC5E124217 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=e-dco-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P5-VrrrgbCab for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E41261201FA for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j7-v6so832667ita.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=e-dco-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Yly35Z4AjsEHGOyH8251/MTcKf8NBs6dt3XrCSHKbYg=; b=jQvi2de0Lrvj3SOpP0OqmaBufcKsxiqw5St4seIoBGkPgJmUOun0D68IMDV3lpfY2H 4TT7+zyVqu8HVMsK4UKuodQwXfSre5+sNIIIhlaRAdC9B6Vn/0tfHVh3q9zHbcqkY4gx i/8pBPXGBxB3SZLNOfpzRlaMJmmJ/Ko6m2AQis1tzpwb2G8c9+TJtV7+kysgBUcCn9m3 D9e7KrjTBIQi2ZIKc5puarO6UL9Lq1u1heWRCydx4Pq0paVrMQIwOe67Vgzrm85RPb2S uOVuVCzULoLlwLdbrXeyhQQnG8Wu2R5SnWXLazDp+msF9FzJsebjr3cyXdciGJ/x8GYd EghA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Yly35Z4AjsEHGOyH8251/MTcKf8NBs6dt3XrCSHKbYg=; b=faFb7AzAulTLXmgtZCzBXWO1EFAur5tqofYxlNUgR4nfx8cIUvg3WQGATghEe0N56k VCgmJV/wM8cCzx+oWksNq+56T+K/dVjPdsVaTrFYuNR/yoiVXafvGe+c1xPdz1DXG/m1 KrE80AicNGFlVb2NGrBD43IkSvtzPqR6h/NYBcXrjwpMCBpo7HSjXPXn70/jRgJi+RkW epk6J5bJQMbeJP82ZNr3SxuHtw6QKESS4JdIc0wAnFUva85gnvKoDz9MZRyohxkDlghA DwIpCvVXkpK6OSIqlBx+5H0evXN8eTfZ7zhkn+slIgZgjnShhFcY93ZKFobQwtuK4eyy YbnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7E+ZPeRZ3/v21p3TsESNOQEP7dfkSoqnGm+2+HliQRej7cKNZHT Nh3K+1B3pjSIWgxt/fWDRpHTmmvH95elhf+tKhx/SA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuMj3Kjlh8tImi2r8dfssguQQTg+YOy0yz1hflBsLuXvhqYfxsDdlOcXNTRZ/OIuYo6p3muuCSyKVj26HDdIDQ=
X-Received: by 10.36.2.200 with SMTP id 191mr1586314itu.108.1520957536202; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.29.138 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoAC2hBEihiuh-0Yx3dYUqgQbieBTitk9O=EUj4dcUkeDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6140B7A6-A1C7-44BC-9C65-9BE0D5E1B580@sn3rd.com> <986797a7-81b0-7874-5f39-afe83c86635b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOgPGoBYc7O+qmjM-ptkRkE6mRsOYgc5O7Wu9pm3drFp3TVa6Q@mail.gmail.com> <d7dfdc1a-2c96-fd88-df1b-3167fe0f804b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1a024320-c674-6f75-ccc4-d27b75e3d017@nomountain.net> <2ed0gc.p5dcxd.31eoyz-qmf@mercury.scss.tcd.ie> <d7ec110f-2a0b-cf97-94a3-eeb5594d8c24@cs.tcd.ie> <CAAF6GDcaG7nousyQ6wotEg4dW8PFuXi=riH2702eZZn2fwfLQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPsNn2XCNtqZaQM6Bg8uoMZRJE+qQakEwvw8Cn9fBm-5H+Xn_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgPGoAC2hBEihiuh-0Yx3dYUqgQbieBTitk9O=EUj4dcUkeDw@mail.gmail.com>
From: nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:12:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPsNn2ViNNu85KzOiBsPsLySVtdDfm3VoKSFPPcz_JR3Khtwwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Colm_MacC=C3=A1rthaigh?= <colm@allcosts.net>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11446d98aa097a05674d85e9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Yi7rYbH5yeIhL8N6nsNYoA3BuEw>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:12:19 -0000

As I wrote to Rich, thanks for the correction.

I hope that we can work together to craft a solution.   We don't want
fragmentation and multiple DIY solutions.

Nalini


On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>; wrote:

> The consensus (as judge by the chairs) was that there no clear consensus
> to shut the discussion down.  It was not that work on internal solution is
> needed.
>
>
>
>


-- 
Thanks,
Nalini Elkins
President
Enterprise Data Center Operators
www.e-dco.com