Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted

nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com> Tue, 13 March 2018 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADC412E8AD for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=e-dco-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b3KTVNXy2avq for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B834D12DA41 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z7-v6so479448iti.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=e-dco-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TDoZL6jx4WHOPS6nto8TPlzqQAjCTDlxldwKHir2H/Q=; b=FbcNluxq1SviJgvySIySfw4aiO9uBbOvSvUhsg4oK6F9t4XKlXLzbtrzEIVDBesFdr 1DSIJGziwttUEQQyBMkIRFD9nS+I3afcIRoWBr61DP5DeeFEfhLjURgY03hbHAFYi19G jbwjz+XFbHpxTppOLmAZpoUcLgj6u91/flCoTY5n1w3PHWSAQhJrWvvExSKJKh2GhY7x l7aZ3WpwLpg9Hp5mvu6FhqW7hgQH22ms4MUhS6zZjC4SkTcJu1xqqrGcE1UfD1l4iaxm +y10hSRFTDeBPhKolo7gJfnvs+fPK7iKUtmUSJStjT7mOLDm0GCkzoq/En5Y7PLizcmS 4OzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TDoZL6jx4WHOPS6nto8TPlzqQAjCTDlxldwKHir2H/Q=; b=YIBBFJqPE+u4NBkKqOxkhxfwwDVnqiH5mD/FTYFUHPnmZguCQdkW2IuorSsqn5F4eM SS6WAJ7UgEL/7VwJ7firIsona4psGlLhdvoyg35mdmBPqnr51iH7vw9x3DoGgPteknvo MyT+jv1zKfDTPaYOXFZF+MTDLv/K0Ys2H8Ek0mCl3S1/dxuZ0h8Q9ZdK9g+vJqpOenBI 0Fh54wdFmQSOQpvSM0cwYre06xp/oqbqhjI9HHE9i16yUm31oX7R7nFirluSGLW2eKXX aWu+tiO7sSZLyY8F6NpmHBYaGHPtveg9VNx3xY90ElDXpD3lo/gul++/jxTzxkSpyPec lewg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7HfpdKRCA04V8Do13CvptdKod1/1tj8FuliGdbaFa4yt8xVf+cd K9yUV3nycEwKmwFz7ifOTHUSvWh4nfcU3HTR76loCQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuc8IyltRvejq0Cy4btT87eQnDGLoGORUKDbUDDh8UkM+DBs9iYoeAjxyyx9clQeuwgRrvWmUNsy8WdUu6qQ58=
X-Received: by 10.36.43.80 with SMTP id h77mr1541134ita.103.1520957364043; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.29.138 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3F8142DE-EADB-4AB9-A204-7D87ACDCD3E3@akamai.com>
References: <6140B7A6-A1C7-44BC-9C65-9BE0D5E1B580@sn3rd.com> <986797a7-81b0-7874-5f39-afe83c86635b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOgPGoBYc7O+qmjM-ptkRkE6mRsOYgc5O7Wu9pm3drFp3TVa6Q@mail.gmail.com> <d7dfdc1a-2c96-fd88-df1b-3167fe0f804b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1a024320-c674-6f75-ccc4-d27b75e3d017@nomountain.net> <2ed0gc.p5dcxd.31eoyz-qmf@mercury.scss.tcd.ie> <d7ec110f-2a0b-cf97-94a3-eeb5594d8c24@cs.tcd.ie> <CAAF6GDcaG7nousyQ6wotEg4dW8PFuXi=riH2702eZZn2fwfLQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPsNn2XCNtqZaQM6Bg8uoMZRJE+qQakEwvw8Cn9fBm-5H+Xn_A@mail.gmail.com> <3F8142DE-EADB-4AB9-A204-7D87ACDCD3E3@akamai.com>
From: nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPsNn2VE_7+rWT0fp9rrVnZrgcY7ORLWTee+kf_Av1dqm4CiDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147413867198405674d7ba6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/sAZINONVjMUmVpKXcBsVssmlKE4>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:09:45 -0000

Thanks for the correction, Rich.

I agree that the room hummed to "continue the discussion".  I hope that we
can all work together to craft a solution.   We don't want fragmentation
and multiple DIY solutions.

Nalini

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

>
>    - Prague where half of the room hummed that an internal solution is
>    needed.
>
>
>
> No, this is not accurate.
>
>
>
> Half the room hummed **to continue discussion.**  The discussion could
> still end with no action.
>
>
>



-- 
Thanks,
Nalini Elkins
President
Enterprise Data Center Operators
www.e-dco.com