IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-pwd

Mohamad Badra <mbadra@gmail.com> Thu, 05 December 2013 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mbadra@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937F01ACCDE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:30:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fAe2hpPe7q9R for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:30:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-x236.google.com (mail-vc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1523B1AE17F for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:30:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id lc6so13965656vcb.27 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:30:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ichuB8hWqGmqtlT0VqFcbTq3iowQ0KT4pasa12CQYxw=; b=CVS8XJSwvvebBB6uDoFh2ZvBkGUK3MEgmbpBy9EZ7pVkwcDPS3OFCeK9eJi5VepjWB rPovstjV0cNLrtsKnByJfQ6wjjRaZakQxBUBEdOwZ6tdvFPRsn+qTOqkbBtxsKLmq8+A hpX+G7fqhpcCWAQbVMg8nI8QDD2iPC98BV44NKCHR0kOjdnafgWShiw3WNABWUB5mcZs /pJZQZ7QHCWIz+ZL7IouJotDda4tXITloH9ISl5hKjrYFQeQVjtSjdfu1xcWJitZ4luQ cljCCZJWszm6l5q+IrAlSW53TVDBMsisr7GnOxOEhluiHXSKkhQrP125l5RGv2qzjQ5q gQ9g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.101.83 with SMTP id b19mr63712vco.42.1386279048451; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:30:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.221.43.138 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:30:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ8ZG3HwTe0gvrrieYAVZZSd=xfU9GWYo1YHMHWmD9c+EsxbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3065D910-832C-47B6-9E0B-2F8DCD2657D2@cisco.com> <529C990D.3020608@gmail.com> <CACsn0cmtP_dF7N2op4DZUwR8t-fW30GmtdqQoteZ+9Y0oH3dUg@mail.gmail.com> <a4b1729af4966e99df1582943f02a0a8.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CACsn0cksrU2GErd6FkZPkXKXK4pSJhTbBoJ-0C-14jsM=UY2iQ@mail.gmail.com> <14e67efee74d2ec6d535f6750ed829db.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CACsn0c=PnB2CA8rpNtcOp6RRLNWHEPN-aN+AdWSF7FJM2wZOog@mail.gmail.com> <6d86c3be1741ed14992ec8662e0d32c7.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CADMpkcKTAARYK2id27T44eVyx6gF24mkt9nAkUZbSmwtEtd2gg@mail.gmail.com> <6c129fd89a9e5953ba844e4e1d1e6e98.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CAGZ8ZG0n7AFWc_WpxLzKbhnRxz8hkQAD-j8VDtX_GOHD5Nc6nw@mail.gmail.com> <7c8448fa356f5d764186ca62552efb1d.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CAGZ8ZG3HwTe0gvrrieYAVZZSd=xfU9GWYo1YHMHWmD9c+EsxbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 01:30:48 +0400
Message-ID: <CAOhHAXyRa+we5G429thrwCVYx2OtGTAYK_24Zh-Rp4YVkMzd2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mohamad Badra <mbadra@gmail.com>
To: Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a7ea43e4f0704ecd03e41"
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-pwd
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:30:54 -0000

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net> wrote:

>
> We should not standardize protocols which are inferior to existing
> ones and to newer alternatives, have insufficient cryptographic
> analysis, have no application,



How was your document betterthan PWD when you initially submitted
draft-taylor-tls-srp-00?​​ The only security analysis was made by the
authors of the paper on SRP.


and have no support in the WG beside
> the draft authors and the NSA [2].
>
>
I am not co-author, nor NSA, but I support this document.

Best regards,
Badra

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email