Re: [TLS] Eleven out of every ten SSL certs aren't valid

Ivan Ristic <ivan.ristic@gmail.com> Tue, 29 June 2010 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ivan.ristic@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA773A6C18 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.613, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Imsv2SIbzt57 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AD03A6823 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so1657514fxm.31 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qIm4Ww1Jg+lU7wQgZpS7SklXZ5szDwaSSrZdLxgIIko=; b=CF3/ukHPtWbg2+FyfHa7/8L/LbmCF/RZW0uxBkAZTnvnox2Tm8cI52DUXLirCSYJ6p Oj0xRj5gujwIUOK7v4s89tHMEeYwEvEfJedTALMyc9/sq7+/Ud71Fk84Dr5tDRlbkdqM mWOT1JxGu+P4+BovZZdJvdbauQfrvUIh/5Bwo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OSQHTCMNL1om8tOM79fRUz4aP1ZO1EfMbd8zmMIUIV80Zc7G6mpCQWOB+oL0OfIQar p5ryKY/Fg4pNOaGYuhLCSBomLWmuCQpODGrQZOnw+NleEQAsq3BnwoFbCa5rN8NPzjVZ 7yXPt2h45S9d8o21pty7UJ3/+fY0YQcAaBNuQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.182.2 with SMTP id o2mr454889hbg.51.1277835939994; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.239.164.79 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C2A1D56.1060704@gnutls.org>
References: <E1OTVaY-0004g3-OW@wintermute02.cs.auckland.ac.nz> <201006291350.o5TDoMoO018788@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp> <AANLkTinWDU7RKXRU1drErtWZSdOyGwSymOBdwXSnYMEB@mail.gmail.com> <7C6BDB4BD9974646856544650C016B82139E7C@XCH117CNC.rim.net> <AANLkTilFGxsxGs9DD737SvlAL-2x1SLp0iaP2wq0u80p@mail.gmail.com> <4C2A1D56.1060704@gnutls.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:25:39 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTil0zVm97gmF05lMk9OdvHLpvKlqOlymN32b2jjK@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ivan Ristic <ivan.ristic@gmail.com>
To: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@gnutls.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Eleven out of every ten SSL certs aren't valid
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:25:41 -0000

The lot: the common name, wildcards, and alternative names too.

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
<nmav@gnutls.org> wrote:
> Ivan Ristic wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Rob P Williams <rwilliams@certicom.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> What steps are being taken to verify that 'valid' ssl is even intended?
>>
>> I have collected about 720K certificates that match the domain names
>> from which they were served. I think it's fair to say those are the
>> cases where SSL was intended.
>
> Out of curiosity, how do you define matching. Do you use the CN only or
>  subject alternative names as well?

-- 
Ivan Ristic
ModSecurity Handbook [http://www.modsecurityhandbook.com]
SSL Labs [https://www.ssllabs.com/ssldb/]