Re: [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-tls13-24

Stan Kalisch <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net> Fri, 06 April 2018 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CC2126D45 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailforce.net header.b=arzLaLDZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=duiX59rw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PF_BPUDwwl4g for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DDD0126BF0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8722130B; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:26:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 06 Apr 2018 19:26:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailforce.net; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=kjhxCkK0GhATXXwsc wUg355GmSgS0RtsgKnQ2E1ptB0=; b=arzLaLDZrN+PNmghXwUYY5Px8bb9ZLQTg 5Z8P7QBINVjtqSjRR7UpoupjyRu+Tz39Xxc30WL8wwBdc1VwKiL0rzn7bfgsCu8G ZOdQTkCrsYLiCVWPPJnnLMP/rtquvMmRuS1ITn57mjvXbAAU7h0YjRYK6yfm+pVR l05/SK2bZzDNfndt/my/vadYCCmCreS+bD/U80EXTbs0YCL/bCclhi8XL8wXt3em sYxIHL/+6CYSJvjL88rTN6LOJSrvHc8bdu91Fgp3kbkVik3mmi3oBEdHl2/nS9qZ v3iC/z+qX/5Vl27W/OCQ7f3i9aktE3ezEndT8vclX0+5kNUhOsS9w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=kjhxCk K0GhATXXwscwUg355GmSgS0RtsgKnQ2E1ptB0=; b=duiX59rwdqSymmnVuu6nZY aLpnq0bFKLSjdMm47Y7ALnclm6aenOtRR3i2BoJWFjhBgLXb2dv+L/NEk38iaymF wIRNK+tPr2UHGUyc0a16uqabu/8Piq2/00rHyV/yePmnsL6F+oXrsWsDb71N9mBx aYt2V3ayZvSAQ7kmkZZ1iG7+dWSCQrxALXQErCTHSVeZLF0jCg1+Q6lHuiTwxDmR vdUGAijksNKeyDteCEAOpryHxFytUbtP4euEtseMMNLMWsdSXPshUlhFAMSnhBq0 h/GkJ8KYptwsQGfhX2SXKSYCSSq6qeocQT0q42QcXwcOIPH1zLKB3HY0EyMMduZw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JwLIWqTNvLqcwrV7_I8FhAPiizs-tSNHMbeQeHogpiDvQCtsAQ3unQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id ACDFBBA43C; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:26:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1523057191.3844723.1329421696.7A2BAE27@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Stan Kalisch <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net>
To: Ion Larranaga Azcue <ilarra@s21sec.com>
Cc: tls@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_152305719138447230"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-61ab7380
References: <1522377304060.20682@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <r470Ps-10133i-7B3DEB3D7CF1410DB2E2FF250A811BB1@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local> <CABcZeBMFrnSUddraBps-b=CujitVfaQuqBFHD9WCAcCKg9M7Tw@mail.gmail.com> <CDC57F65-C88C-43BB-B4DB-77AEE9B437EF@gmail.com> <1522462562850.29528@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <2C1F7A14-45B0-49DE-98B1-897223F7A1B0@akamai.com> <1522559738688.99197@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <7EBF2F91-6FEA-4705-BB1A-3FB5D7E33949@akamai.com> <2DA08233-1EC4-4371-943B-E41BF5D8DA8C@dukhovni.org> <109337BE-3299-46B5-A2F8-9583107AB537@akamai.com> <1523025589.2651530.1328912616.6FC37C86@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1523044476527.20197@s21sec.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 19:26:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1523044476527.20197@s21sec.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/x5mKPNUDMz_3D57R9sSKp-FHfbM>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-tls13-24
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 23:26:34 -0000

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, at 3:54 PM, Ion Larranaga Azcue wrote:
> My opinion is that if we are going to have extended error codes, it's
> better to use numeric ones and not text based errors.
That was my own gut feeling on the least painful way to go, but I'm open
to the possibility that gut feeling was woefully naive.

Stan