[Tools-discuss] Serving a partial documents (was Re: [rfc-i] Citing drafts)

[Robert Sparks <[e-mail]>]

So, I _think_ the way the main document page behaves now was intended to 
protect people on low bandwidth or expensive bandwidth connections from 
very large documents.

Is that still something we should consider important? Or would it be 
better if the main page served the whole document all the time?

RjS

On 2/26/21 11:46 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Moved from rfc-interest (BCC) to tools-discuss.
>
>>     My pet hate is that I have to scroll to the bottom before I can tell the
>      system that I want the lot.
>
> (Are hates what peeves become when fully grown? :)
>   
> One the one hand, I get it.  I find it annoying too.  On the other hand, you're presumably already down at the bottom of the page at the time you see it. On the third hand, it's annoying to have to tweak the link if you already started sharing it. On the fourth hand, it could be an easy change.
>
> When would you want to get the full document?  When you click on a document from the WG page?  (e.g., https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/acme/documents/ )
>
>