IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we include a "i don't understand" or "not enough information" option

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 19 November 2020 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1618C3A10D0 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:18:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9XMnr1bj8dJm for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:18:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4DD3A0B84 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:18:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAB9389C2; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:19:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lqdjPzdkHqG3; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:19:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E67389BB; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:19:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE5F3BF; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:18:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8e52e602-f4ef-4020-be67-2c9ed4fa4fb6@www.fastmail.com>
References: <87ima2bkgb.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <CABcZeBOYpGW4ejd50iq7=dTO9O8VL4pUGJyiz2oWwJ2ET4kG4Q@mail.gmail.com> <87a6veb06h.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <8e52e602-f4ef-4020-be67-2c9ed4fa4fb6@www.fastmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:18:23 -0500
Message-ID: <23568.1605770303@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/NiU2ceDhFrhFWeFCzfVr7KDvDTA>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we include a "i don't understand" or "not enough information" option
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:18:28 -0000

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
    > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020, at 12:33, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
    >> On Wed 2020-11-18 14:58:28 -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
    >> > Is there some reason why the responses have to be canned and can't be
    >> > provided by the chairs? Then we could just have as many as the chairs want
    >> > and with whatever content.
    >>
    >> If we do this (i'd be happy with it, and we could provide some
    >> pre-canned choices for a WG chair that just wants something simple),
    >> it'd be nice to stage the polling options visibly so the group can
    >> preview them before the "hand raising" starts.

    > A related suggestion: have the poll take the place of the slides.  Or
    > show it in an overlay.  The tabbed interface is quite poor for this. As

THIS.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email