Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we include a "i don't understand" or "not enough information" option

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 18 November 2020 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5137C3A0E26 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:59:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hEzAcQoddI_Q for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:59:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E37F13A0E1A for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l10so4186450lji.4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:59:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eJsVR1RsVnC/ifJr2h9bUwmDLGTiu8QbQzm5GQ9fQig=; b=czYD4FctJ2U9uPA2X9xIAwy/jFAsovhD1UA8bOuUftcCnjg7tVxrX8XQL5WfGNQZkO O+dFJtnwlipfTgU4N/xM63utKYbd5E3LgmTFDek4o4I0XQXUR2eT/dnti2gB9pSjzVaI nJeOIzg/nH00XIWs85JcplHhn8xaNeTzcM8YDORVqPHg3A54rF/M3Rfdz9Ip1kdwPqRS QbESLJR6YLJGMzUPdkcg95onkI9n7u8uNktMsZtKvnlwXYRpMG822SEE9j/vxciTspRt o4eHEtMO0r9mluvqlHWCkL1gk2Ev5MvqbJ8X/zZajc7KtS+DNjTSEEx8ur/W9cST6XfB 9Uww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eJsVR1RsVnC/ifJr2h9bUwmDLGTiu8QbQzm5GQ9fQig=; b=cmOHAatu8Y1R6UFsIFA9aBcA4DruvCV2AhD1VY7NuY7oKAlR/YZkS6c2bp8UNmDKhc vlXQEbrGN+2xXPUZDZtlPDKGWuNQpF7/m9UlI9maPNCXYurKdqPD0lLojjkguNxL6Ii8 QEPPxrLOEPHAS+ujyuom/nQ+ZgK4jlx3dLmvAXaf6ojSIZg8DEvz6Bzk65Z/m3hsEC2a TrWL9XMl55n45yVFqPVKz5o6rRsjTaAl8onDu9DkfeeWLYiGM/1dy1hIy3mIf4WzaNws 3d7rubknZky/O/CBGomSzEa80hAjE6YhLR7IxOtYeraUUZclq3sK4TJHdY53bt2Dz6R8 VoVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QeBHaicMuUcQjLHmZeOXgzy+ujRtDQFEhYqfo+cwKB3Rym0A6 fvexvF3yarX5Ujn30z0e+cy8pM/st5WDXivcjfu9kJJIZhJFTg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyK5oKQzw0VJuooTyuJ/YCIFT/vjTvizpE57WLhHh452ilLq+AAJfcuKnNcPkjUSLh7Px8ysrgLl5yWGhHtFPQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9096:: with SMTP id l22mr4919510ljg.199.1605740344755; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:59:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87ima2bkgb.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
In-Reply-To: <87ima2bkgb.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:58:28 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOYpGW4ejd50iq7=dTO9O8VL4pUGJyiz2oWwJ2ET4kG4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Cc: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d9e0df05b4698e1e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/VEH4jBDlu_a50jQpyRduNJ-ECj0>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we include a "i don't understand" or "not enough information" option
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:59:09 -0000

n Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:05 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
wrote:

> Currently, when there's a show of hands in meetecho, there are two
> actions any participant can take:
>
>  - raise my hand
>  - do not raise my hand
>
> in my experience, if a meeting has 100 participants, you're lucky to get
> 50 that select either of the above options.  At least half tend to give
> no response at all.
>
> There are two reasons to give neither response though:
>
>  - the question is confusing, invalid, wrong, i didn't understand it, or
>    i'm not sure of the answer
>
>  - i am asleep/bored/not paying attention
>
> It'd be nice to be able to to distinguish between these two large
> classes of non-responding participants.  This is akin to including an
> "N/A" or "Don't know" answer in a multiple choice survey.
>
> Could such a option be added?  I don't want clutter with a dozen extra
> options, but it would be useful to know how many people are paying
> attention but object to the binary framing for whatever reason.
>

Is there some reason why the responses have to be canned and can't be
provided by the chairs? Then we could just have as many as the chairs want
and with whatever content.

-Ekr

       --dkg
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
>
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org
>